Voltage using different references

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between electric potential and electric field for a uniformly charged solid sphere with charge Q and radius R. Two potential equations were derived based on different zero-point references: one with V(∞)=0 and another with V(0)=0. Despite the differences in potential values, the electric field remains unchanged, confirming that the electric field is independent of the chosen reference point for potential. The conclusion emphasizes that altering the zero potential reference only shifts the potential by a constant, leaving the electric field invariant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and electric field concepts
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly gradients and differentiation
  • Knowledge of electrostatics, specifically for charged spherical distributions
  • Basic grasp of reference points in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from potentials in electrostatics
  • Explore the implications of reference points in electric circuits
  • Learn about the mathematical relationship between electric potential and electric field using calculus
  • Investigate other charge distributions and their electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone studying electrostatics who seeks to deepen their understanding of electric fields and potentials in relation to reference points.

darioslc
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
How the choice of zero voltage at the origin changes the electric field.
Relevant Equations
##\oint_S\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S}=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0}##
##V(r)=-\int \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}##
The problem is for a solid sphere uniformly charged with Q and radii R.
First I calculated taked ##V(\infty)=0##, giving me for :
$$
\begin{align*}
V(r)=&\frac{3Q}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 R}-\frac{Q}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 R^3}r^2\qquad\text{if $r<R$}\\
V(r)=&\frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}\quad\text{if $r\geq R$}\\
\end{align*}
$$
so far well, but when I calculated the voltage with ##V(0)=0## I get a little similar expression:
$$
\begin{align*}
V(r)=&
\begin{cases}
-\frac{Q}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 R^3}r^2\qquad\text{if $r<R$}\\
-\frac{3Q}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 R}+\frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}\qquad\text{if $r\geq R$}\\
\end{cases}
\end{align*}
$$
for both, I used the expression of the electric field
$$
\begin{align*}
\vec{E}(r)=&
\begin{cases}
\frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0R^3}r^2\qquad\text{if $r<R$}\\
\frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0r}\qquad\text{if $r\geq R$}\\
\end{cases}
\end{align*}
$$

In both cases, when I apply the gradient ##\vec{E}=-\nabla V## I get the same field, and I can't understand how can change the field if I take other zero-point references, is not independent of potential? ie, always I get the same field
Maybe have an error in calculus, but I didn't found it.

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe potential is always measured relative to something, whereas the electric field is 'absolute'/fixed. Therefore, when you set the zero potential point to a different place, you can get a different potential as you are measuring relative to a different point. An electric circuit is an example; when we say the voltage is '5 V', we really mean that it has a potential that is +5V greater than the chosen zero (i.e. ground). If we chose the ground elsewhere, then the potential would be different I think.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
darioslc said:
In both cases, when I apply the gradient ##\vec{E}=-\nabla V## I get the same field

Hi. You are supposed to get the same field. Changing the zero potential reference point does not affect the field.

Changing the reference point simply adds a constant amount to every point's potential.

A change from 100V to 150V over a some distance gives the same field as a change from 120V to 170V over the same distance.

Think of the equivalent gravitational situation: g = -9.81m/s² at the Earth's surface whether you choose to take V=0 at ground level or V=0 at ∞.
 
Hi, thanks for your responses. Then the field shouldn't vary? this is what I was thinking, or the question is a little captious.
 
That's right - the field cannot be changed by changing the reference point. Note that this in not limited to spherical charge distributions, it is always true. I guess the question was set to make you think about why it is true.

If we change the zero reference point, the potential at every point changes by the same fixed amount (say k). Since constants disappear on differentiation:
\vec{E}=-\nabla (V+k) = -\nabla (V)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
661
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
710
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K