Voltage using different references

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric potential for a uniformly charged solid sphere with charge Q and radius R, using different reference points for zero potential. The original poster presents two expressions for voltage based on different reference points and questions the independence of the electric field from the choice of reference potential.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how changing the zero-point reference affects the electric field and potential. Some participants discuss the nature of electric potential as relative and the electric field as absolute, while others emphasize that changing the reference point does not alter the electric field.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided insights into the relationship between electric potential and electric field, noting that changing the reference point for potential does not affect the electric field. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of this relationship, with some participants affirming the original poster's understanding while others clarify the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes considerations of how potential is measured relative to a chosen reference point and the implications of this choice on calculations involving electric fields.

darioslc
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
How the choice of zero voltage at the origin changes the electric field.
Relevant Equations
##\oint_S\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S}=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0}##
##V(r)=-\int \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}##
The problem is for a solid sphere uniformly charged with Q and radii R.
First I calculated taked ##V(\infty)=0##, giving me for :
$$
\begin{align*}
V(r)=&\frac{3Q}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 R}-\frac{Q}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 R^3}r^2\qquad\text{if $r<R$}\\
V(r)=&\frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}\quad\text{if $r\geq R$}\\
\end{align*}
$$
so far well, but when I calculated the voltage with ##V(0)=0## I get a little similar expression:
$$
\begin{align*}
V(r)=&
\begin{cases}
-\frac{Q}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 R^3}r^2\qquad\text{if $r<R$}\\
-\frac{3Q}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 R}+\frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}\qquad\text{if $r\geq R$}\\
\end{cases}
\end{align*}
$$
for both, I used the expression of the electric field
$$
\begin{align*}
\vec{E}(r)=&
\begin{cases}
\frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0R^3}r^2\qquad\text{if $r<R$}\\
\frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0r}\qquad\text{if $r\geq R$}\\
\end{cases}
\end{align*}
$$

In both cases, when I apply the gradient ##\vec{E}=-\nabla V## I get the same field, and I can't understand how can change the field if I take other zero-point references, is not independent of potential? ie, always I get the same field
Maybe have an error in calculus, but I didn't found it.

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe potential is always measured relative to something, whereas the electric field is 'absolute'/fixed. Therefore, when you set the zero potential point to a different place, you can get a different potential as you are measuring relative to a different point. An electric circuit is an example; when we say the voltage is '5 V', we really mean that it has a potential that is +5V greater than the chosen zero (i.e. ground). If we chose the ground elsewhere, then the potential would be different I think.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
darioslc said:
In both cases, when I apply the gradient ##\vec{E}=-\nabla V## I get the same field

Hi. You are supposed to get the same field. Changing the zero potential reference point does not affect the field.

Changing the reference point simply adds a constant amount to every point's potential.

A change from 100V to 150V over a some distance gives the same field as a change from 120V to 170V over the same distance.

Think of the equivalent gravitational situation: g = -9.81m/s² at the Earth's surface whether you choose to take V=0 at ground level or V=0 at ∞.
 
Hi, thanks for your responses. Then the field shouldn't vary? this is what I was thinking, or the question is a little captious.
 
That's right - the field cannot be changed by changing the reference point. Note that this in not limited to spherical charge distributions, it is always true. I guess the question was set to make you think about why it is true.

If we change the zero reference point, the potential at every point changes by the same fixed amount (say k). Since constants disappear on differentiation:
\vec{E}=-\nabla (V+k) = -\nabla (V)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
786
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
828
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K