Volume by disks, shells, or washers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KMcFadden
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
Click For Summary
Determining the volume of a solid using disks, shells, or washers depends on the shape and characteristics of the solid. The shell method is often preferred for complex shapes, while the disk method is suitable for simple shapes without holes. If a hole is present, the washer method is applicable. The choice of method can also be influenced by which produces a more manageable integral for evaluation. Ultimately, the decision relies on the specific functions that define the region being revolved.
KMcFadden
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
What is the easiest way to determine if the volume of a solid should be found by using disks, shells, or washers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Personally I always start with the shell method unless it is a really basic, simple shape(disk method)... But to answer ur question, I look for a hole. If there is one, then i am thinking washer, if there isn't and the solid is a very simple shape, then I go with the disk method. For the most complex shapes, i automatically go to the shell method.
 
KMcFadden said:
What is the easiest way to determine if the volume of a solid should be found by using disks, shells, or washers?
There is no one-size-fits-all guidance here. It depends on the function/functions that bound the region being revolved. The disk and washer methods are essentially the same, with the washer method being used if the typical volume element is a disk with a hole in it.

Sometimes one method produces an integral that's easier to evaluate, and sometimes another method does.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
36K