Volume Charge Density in Spherical and Cylindrical Coordinat

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of volume charge density for a charged ring in both cylindrical and spherical coordinates. The original poster presents a problem involving a ring of radius R with a total charge Q uniformly distributed along it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the expression of volume charge density in cylindrical and spherical coordinates, questioning the need for additional delta functions to account for the geometry of the ring.
  • There are attempts to clarify the integration process and the correct form of the volume element in both coordinate systems.
  • Some participants express confusion about the dependencies on certain variables and the implications of using delta functions in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Guidance has been provided regarding the necessary corrections to the volume elements and the inclusion of specific delta functions. Participants are actively refining their expressions for the charge density based on the feedback received, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering the volume charge density rather than area due to the nature of the ring. There is also mention of the integration limits for the angular components in both coordinate systems.

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


Consider a ring of radius R placed on the xy-plane with its center at the origin. A total charge of Q is uniformly distributed on the ring.
a) Express the volume charge density of this configuration ρ(s,Φ,z) in cylindrical coordinates.
b) Express the volume charge density of this configuration ρ(r,Θ,Φ) in spherical coordinates.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am going to show you the work that I did.

a) ρ(s) = C\delta (s-R)
And so, we need to find the constant C.
Q = \int ρda = \int C \delta (s-R) \pi R^2 dR
Thus ##C = \frac{Q}{\pi R^2}## and we see
ρ(s) = \frac{Q}{\pi R^2}\delta(s-R)

Now, part b is pretty much the same thing.
ρ(r)=C \delta (r-R)
Q = \int ρda = \int C \delta (r-R) \pi r^2dr
C = \frac{Q}{\pi R^2}
ρ(r) = \frac{Q}{\pi R^2} \delta(r-R)Did I do everything right or am I missing something? I ask because it seems to 'easy' to be this identical.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to do these integrals over ## dv ##, and they both need a couple of corrections. ## \\ ## a) For cylindrical coordinates, ## dv=s \,ds \, d\Phi \, dz ##. There is no ## \Phi ## dependence, but you will need a ## \delta(z) ## function in addition to the ## \delta(s-R) ##. ## \\ ## b) For spherical coordinates, ## dv=r^2 \, sin(\theta) \, d \theta \, d\phi \, dr ##. A hint in part (b) is you will need a ## \delta(\theta-\theta_o) ## type delta function for some ## \theta_o ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mikiluv1 and RJLiberator
Charles, thanks for the help.

I see that it needs to be in volume due to the volume charge density. I was messed up as it is a ring, so I thought it'd just be area.

With your help/hints, I think I have the following:
a)
ρ(s) = \frac{q}{R} \delta (s-R) \delta (z)
From the integration of
Q = \int ρdv = \int C \delta (s-R) \delta (z) sdsdz
Which evaluates at s = R, and z =0, thus leaving CR = Q and C = Q/R which is where we get the final ρ(s).

b)
ρ(r) = \frac{Q}{R^2} \delta(r-R) \delta (\theta - \theta_0)
From the integration of
Q = \int ρdv = \int C \delta(r-R) \delta( \theta - \theta_0) r^2sin(\theta)d \theta dr

In part b, I use dr instead of dΦ as there is dependence on r and theta, is that correct? (reference to your post)
 
For (a) you left off the ## d \Phi ## in the ## dv ## with its integration. You also left off the ## d \phi ## in the ## dv ## in the integration of part (b). For part(b), you should be able to give the value of ## \theta_o ## based on the spherical coordinates that will make the ring in the x-y plane. The ## d \theta ## integration will subsequently get you a ## sin(\theta_o) ## term, but since you know ## \theta_o ##, you also know ## sin(\theta_o) ##. ## \\ ## And a hint for the ## d \phi ## integrations is that in both (a) and (b) it goes from ## 0 ## to ## 2 \pi ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
I see.
I had thought that due to the dirac delta function and the "lack of dependecny" on dΦ that I wouldn't need them. But it is clear that there is a dependency on this volume charge.
The thing I needed to add to both integrals was dΦ and this goes from 0 to 2pi as it is a ring, this results in the 2pi factor being included in my answers now.

As for the ##sin( \theta_0 )## term, we see that the dirac delta function for that term is equal to 0 when ##( \theta - \pi/2)## is equal to 0. So ##\theta = \pi /2##. Now, ##sin( \pi /2) = 1## thus it is a non-factor in the final volume distribution.

a)
<br /> ρ(s) = \frac{q}{2 \pi R} \delta (s-R) \delta (z)
b)
<br /> ρ(r) = \frac{Q}{2 \pi R^2} \delta(r-R) \delta (\theta - \theta_0)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
Very good ! Don't forget to put ## \theta_o=\pi/2 ## in your answer to (b).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Thank you for the help! Thread is solved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
749
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K