Volume of Revolution: Find Vol. Bounded by y=6-2x-x2, y=x+6 About x=1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aurin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Revolution Volume
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The volume of the solid generated by revolving the region bounded by the curves y=6-2x-x² and y=x+6 about the line x=1 is calculated using the shell method. The correct expressions for p(x) and h(x) are p(x) = 1 - x and h(x) = -3x - x², respectively. The integration yields a final volume of -9π/2, indicating a miscalculation in the setup. The negative result suggests a need to reassess the distance calculations for p(x) and the orientation of the region being revolved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the shell method for volume calculation
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions and their intersections
  • Knowledge of integration techniques
  • Ability to interpret graphical representations of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the shell method for calculating volumes of revolution
  • Practice finding intersections of polynomial functions
  • Study integration of polynomial expressions
  • Explore graphical tools for visualizing functions and their revolutions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on volumes of revolution, and educators looking for examples of common mistakes in applying the shell method.

Aurin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the volume of the solid generated by revolving the region bounded by the given graph about the indicated line using any method.

y=6-2x-x2
y=x+6

About the axis x=1

Homework Equations



Shell method:

2*pi * INT[ p(x) * h(x) ] dx

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I attempted latex, even using your beginner's guide, and it showed equations that didn't even look partially like what I input, so forgive me. =(

Second, I attempted the shell method because the disk method would require changing the equations into terms of y, and this seemed simple enough.

I've graphed the equations, and determined the following:

The two lines intersect at (-3,3) and (0,6) so the boundaries are a=-3 and b=0. The region is bound in the second quadrant, thus p(x) is the distance from the y-axis plus the distance of the axis of rotation from the y-axis. h(x) is the smaller equation subtracted from the larger equation.

p(x) = x+1
h(x) = 6-2x-x2 - (x+6) = -3x-x2

2*pi * INT[(x+1)(-3x-x2)]dx Plugged in p(x) and h(x)

2*pi * INT(-x3-4x2-3x)dx FOIL

2*pi * (-x4/4 - 4x3/3 - 3x2/2) from -3 to 0. Integrated

If you plug in 0 you receive 0, thus

2*pi * [-(-81/4 + 108/3 - 27/2)] Carefully substituting -3 into the equation.

2*pi * (81/4 - 108/3 + 27/2) Multiplied the -1

2*pi * (243/12 - 432/12 + 162/12) Found a common denominator

2*pi * (-27/12) Simplified

-9pi/2 Reduced and Simplified more

So my final answer is a negative volume. I've looked at this carefully time and time again, and the result is always negative. I realize this is probably difficult to work with, considering the lack of latex and no visual, but I appreciate any input.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aurin said:

Homework Statement



Find the volume of the solid generated by revolving the region bounded by the given graph about the indicated line using any method.

y=6-2x-x2
y=x+6

About the axis x=1

Homework Equations



Shell method:

2*pi * INT[ p(x) * h(x) ] dx

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I attempted latex, even using your beginner's guide, and it showed equations that didn't even look partially like what I input, so forgive me. =(

Second, I attempted the shell method because the disk method would require changing the equations into terms of y, and this seemed simple enough.

I've graphed the equations, and determined the following:

The two lines intersect at (-3,3) and (0,6) so the boundaries are a=-3 and b=0. The region is bound in the second quadrant, thus p(x) is the distance from the y-axis plus the distance of the axis of rotation from the y-axis. h(x) is the smaller equation subtracted from the larger equation.

p(x) = x+1
The radius, which you are calling p(x), is 1 - x, not x + 1. For example, at the point (-3, 3), the distance to the line x = 1 is 1 - (-3) = 4. Similarly, at the point (0, 6), the distance to the line x = 1 is 1 - 0 = 1.
Aurin said:
h(x) = 6-2x-x2 - (x+6) = -3x-x2

2*pi * INT[(x+1)(-3x-x2)]dx Plugged in p(x) and h(x)

2*pi * INT(-x3-4x2-3x)dx FOIL

2*pi * (-x4/4 - 4x3/3 - 3x2/2) from -3 to 0. Integrated

If you plug in 0 you receive 0, thus

2*pi * [-(-81/4 + 108/3 - 27/2)] Carefully substituting -3 into the equation.

2*pi * (81/4 - 108/3 + 27/2) Multiplied the -1

2*pi * (243/12 - 432/12 + 162/12) Found a common denominator

2*pi * (-27/12) Simplified

-9pi/2 Reduced and Simplified more

So my final answer is a negative volume. I've looked at this carefully time and time again, and the result is always negative. I realize this is probably difficult to work with, considering the lack of latex and no visual, but I appreciate any input.
 
Oh man.. haha, what a ridiculous mistake.

I had looked at many examples to see if my p(x) followed the rules, and one of them did indeed add 1 to x, so it made so much sense to try it here, but it's not the same case. Negatives are my weakness. =(

Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K