Volume of Solid: Find Revolving Around x=-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter science.girl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solid Volume
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The volume of the solid generated by revolving the region bounded by the curves y = -x² + 4x - 3 and y = 0 around the line x = -1 can be calculated using the method of cylindrical shells. The height of the cylindrical shell is determined by the function y = -x² + 4x - 3, and the radius of the shell is given by the expression x + 1. The integral of the surface area of the cylindrical shell multiplied by its thickness will yield the volume of the solid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the method of cylindrical shells
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of the properties of quadratic functions
  • Ability to set up and evaluate definite integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of cylindrical shells in detail
  • Practice evaluating definite integrals involving quadratic functions
  • Learn how to derive volume formulas for solids of revolution
  • Explore variations of problems involving rotation around different axes
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on volume calculations for solids of revolution, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of integral calculus applications.

science.girl
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Problem:
Find the volume of the solid generated by revolving about the line x = -1, the region bounded by the curves y = -x^2 +4x -3 and y =0.

Attempt at a Solution:
I know that subtracting y = 0 from y = -x^2 +4x -3 will give the area in 1 dimension. So, would you use shells? I'm not sure how to set this up.

Additionally, the solid is being rotated around x = -1, so it must be different than problems with solids revolving around x = 0, correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
science.girl said:
Problem:
Find the volume of the solid generated by revolving about the line x = -1, the region bounded by the curves y = -x^2 +4x -3 and y =0.

Attempt at a Solution:
I know that subtracting y = 0 from y = -x^2 +4x -3 will give the area in 1 dimension. So, would you use shells? I'm not sure how to set this up.
Since you are rotating around around x= -1 and are writing the formula in terms of x, yes, use "shells". "Subtracting y= 0 from y= -x^2+ 4x- 3" does NOT give area (its integral does). It give the height of the very thin cylinder forming the shell. What is the surface area? The volume of the thin cylinder is its surface area time its thickness, ds. Integrate theat.

Additionally, the solid is being rotated around x = -1, so it must be different than problems with solids revolving around x = 0, correct?
Only in that the radius of the cylindrical shells is x-(-1)= x+1, not x- 0= x.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K