Volume preserving mapping in R^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter shoplifter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mapping Volume
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
shoplifter
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

Find all [tex]\mathcal{C}^1[/tex] functions [tex]f(\mathbf{x})[/tex] in [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex] such that the mapping [tex]\psi : \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}^3[/tex] also preserves volumes, where

[tex] \begin{equation*}<br /> \psi(\mathbf{x}) = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \\<br /> x_1^2 + x_2 \\<br /> f(\mathbf{x})<br /> \end{array} \right).<br /> \end{equation*}[/tex]

Here, the mapping preserves volumes in the sense that for any Jordan domain [tex]D \in \mathbb{R}^3[/tex] the sets [tex]D[/tex] and [tex]\phi(D)[/tex] have the same volume.


Homework Equations



The obvious relevant equation is the Change of Variable theorem. Another one that I used was the fact that the determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries.


The Attempt at a Solution



Using those two facts, I got the solution [tex]f(\mathbf{x})[/tex] has to be a continuously differentiable function of [tex]x_1, x_2[/tex] plus or minus [tex]x_3[/tex], i.e. it must be of the form

[tex] \begin{equation*}<br /> f(\mathbf{x}) = g(x_1, x_2) \pm x_3,<br /> \end{equation*}[/tex]

where [tex]g(x_1, x_2)[/tex] is a continuously differentiable function of two variables. Am I right? Can someone please help?

Thanks very much for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you've got it right. Setting the Jacobian=1 gives |df/dx3|=1. That's what you did, correct?
 
yes, but can i take the jacobean for a nonlinear mapping like this? is the change of coordinates theorem applicable?

thanks.
 
Sure it applies. A change of coordinates doesn't have to be linear.
 
it has to be bijective though, right? but now it seems to me that this *is* going to be bijective, because the first two coordinates fix x_1 and x_2, and the last one therefore fixes x_3.

am i right?

thanks fr ur help, very mcuh.
 
Sure. If you write psi(x1,x2,x3)=(a,b,c) it's pretty easy to solve for x1, x2 and x3 in terms of a, b and c.