Why Is the Normal Force the Same on Both Blocks in a Frictional System?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks, one resting on top of the other, with a focus on understanding the normal force in a frictional system. The scenario includes a smaller block on a larger block, with specific masses and a coefficient of static friction provided. The objective is to determine the minimum horizontal force required to prevent the smaller block from slipping.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the normal force acting on the smaller block and the total force of the system. There are questions about the implications of forces acting on both blocks and how they relate to acceleration and net forces.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the reasoning behind the equality of forces acting on the blocks. Some have provided insights into viewing the blocks as a single system, while others express confusion about the forces involved and their implications for acceleration.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the action-reaction principle and how it applies to the forces acting on the blocks. The discussion is constrained by the need for clarity on the definitions and relationships of the forces involved.

OrlandoLewis
Messages
25
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The two blocks (m=16kg and M=88kg) are not attached to each other. The coefficient of static friction between the blocks is us=0.38, but the surface beneath the larger block is frictionless. What is the minimum magnitude of the horizontal force F required to keep the smaller block from slipping down the larger block?
(I've attached the figure in this thread)

Homework Equations


Let F be the force applied and F' be the Force of the system
F = mg/[us(1-[m/(m+M)])]

The Attempt at a Solution


I already know the solution to the problem but I'm having a hard time seeing why the normal force of the smaller block is equal to the total force of the whole system, not to the force applied to the smaller block.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    13.2 KB · Views: 562
Physics news on Phys.org
OrlandoLewis said:
the total force of the whole system,
I don't know what you mean by that.
Certainly the force applied is not equal to the he normal reaction from the larger block. If it were, there would be no net force on the smaller block, so no acceleration. If the smaller block is not accelerating then the larger block is not - or the two would separate. If no acceleration of the larger block then no net force on it. No net force on it implies no force from the smaller block.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OrlandoLewis
haruspex said:
I don't know what you mean by that.
Certainly the force applied is not equal to the he normal reaction from the larger block. If it were, there would be no net force on the smaller block, so no acceleration. If the smaller block is not accelerating then the larger block is not - or the two would separate. If no acceleration of the larger block then no net force on it. No net force on it implies no force from the smaller block.

What I mean is the force of the two block combined which is equal to their total mass multiplied by the acceleration.
Why is it equal to the horizontal normal force to the smaller block?
 
OrlandoLewis said:
What I mean is the force of the two block combined which is equal to their total mass multiplied by the acceleration.
Why is it equal to the horizontal normal force to the smaller block?
You are free to think of the two blocks as a single system. That system has an overall mass, all parts of it have the same horizontal acceleration, and there is just one external horizontal force acting on it. F=ma.
 
OrlandoLewis said:
Why is it equal to the horizontal normal force to the smaller block?

The small block appears to only have two horizontal forces. If they are equal but opposite, what is the result?
 
TomHart said:
The small block appears to only have two horizontal forces. If they are equal but opposite, what is the result?
I've attached here the free body diagram which yields the correct answer.
2016-08-29%2011.45.18.jpg

I doesn't really makes sense to me why the positive horizontal force F' is equal to the one horizontal force applied to the smaller block (negative direction).
 
Last edited:
OrlandoLewis said:
the positive horizontal force F' is equal to the one horizontal force applied to the smaller block (negative direction).
I don't understand what you mean by that. There are two forces applied to the smaller block, F and F'. F' is the reaction from the larger block, so is equal and opposite to the force on the larger block. F and F' are not equal.
 
haruspex said:
I don't understand what you mean by that. There are two forces applied to the smaller block, F and F'. F' is the reaction from the larger block, so is equal and opposite to the force on the larger block. F and F' are not equal.
Sorry for not being to specific... I hope this'll get clearer.
My question is why is F' on the left (smaller block), the same as F' on the right (larger block)...
The intuition confuses me
 
Last edited:
OrlandoLewis said:
Sorry for not being to specific... I hope this'll get clearer.
My question is why is F' on the left (smaller block), the same as F' on the right (larger block)...
The intuition confuses me
It is fundamental that action and reaction are equal and opposite. I cannot think of a way to make it more intuitive.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K