Was the 1908 Siberia Explosion Caused by a Comet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EnumaElish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explosion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The 1908 Siberia explosion is now suggested to have been caused by a comet rather than an asteroid, according to new evidence presented by Kelley's team. Their research indicates that the comet, rich in water ice, would have disintegrated at an altitude similar to that of space shuttle exhaust plumes, injecting water vapor into the atmosphere. This phenomenon raises questions about the transport of water vapor over vast distances, necessitating a new model of upper-atmospheric physics involving counter-rotating eddies with extreme energy. The findings were published in the June 24 issue of Geophysical Research Letters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of comet and asteroid composition
  • Familiarity with atmospheric physics and transport phenomena
  • Knowledge of space shuttle launch dynamics
  • Basic principles of fluid dynamics and eddy formation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "cometary composition and behavior" to understand differences from asteroids
  • Study "upper-atmospheric physics models" to grasp new theories proposed by Kelley
  • Explore "counter-rotating eddies in fluid dynamics" for insights into energy transfer
  • Investigate "water vapor transport in the atmosphere" for implications on climate science
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in atmospheric sciences, astrophysicists, and educators interested in the dynamics of celestial events and their impact on Earth's atmosphere.

EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Messages
2,348
Reaction score
124
[PLAIN said:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20090629/sc_space/spaceshuttleandstrangecloudskeytomysterious1908explosion]"New[/PLAIN] evidence from an unlikely source -- water vapor in the exhaust plumes of space shuttles launched a century later -- points to a comet."

Just last year, many experts were figuring it was an asteroid.

But Kelley's team thinks a comet fits better, since comets are loaded with water ice (asteroids are mostly rock and metals). The comet would have started to break up at about the same altitude as the release of the exhaust plume from the space shuttle following launch, they calculate. In both cases, water vapor was injected into the atmosphere.

But how did the water vapor travel so far?

"There is a mean transport of this material for tens of thousands of kilometers in a very short time, and there is no model that predicts that," Kelley said. "It's totally new and unexpected physics."

Kelley and his colleague say a new model of upper-atmospheric physics is needed. They propose counter-rotating eddies with extreme energy. Once the water vapor got caught up in these eddies, it traveled very quickly -- close to 300 feet per second, they write in the June 24 issue of the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

This got me wondering: If vapor can travel down so fast, can it also travel up at the same speed? Can other gases or particles be injected into or dejected from the atmosphere at this speed?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
EnumaElish said:
This got me wondering: If vapor can travel down so fast, can it also travel up at the same speed? Can other gases or particles be injected into or dejected from the atmosphere at this speed?
Sure. But there would have to be a fair amount of mass involved.

Perhaps this volcanic eruption is the nearest thing.

Stunning pictures of the volcano that blew a hole in the sky as astronauts witness eruption from International Space Station
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=38985
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
595
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K