Water electrolyser electrode material

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the selection of electrode materials for a DIY water electrolyser aimed at efficiently producing gases while minimizing toxic byproducts. Participants explore various materials, their properties, and the challenges associated with gas evolution in electrolysis systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is considering acrylic housing with a textile separator for gas collection and is seeking affordable electrode materials.
  • Concerns were raised about using stainless steel due to the production of toxic hexavalent chromium and questions about its long-term durability.
  • Graphite electrodes were tested, but there are doubts about their ability to withstand oxygen production without disintegration and concerns about erosion and gas trapping.
  • Platinum electrodes are noted for their effectiveness and durability, but their high cost is a significant barrier. The feasibility of using platinized titanium electrodes is questioned.
  • Another participant suggests that gas evolution may be limited by insulating gas bubbles on electrode surfaces, proposing that industrial methods might involve techniques to dislodge these bubbles.
  • Lead electrodes are mentioned as a potential option, though toxicity concerns are acknowledged.
  • A participant references polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis but notes that it may not be practical for home projects.
  • Nickel/iron oxide electrodes are discussed as a promising approach, but practical implementation at home is questioned.
  • Techniques such as using sonic vibrations or pulsed DC to enhance gas evolution are suggested, along with considerations for electrode orientation.
  • There is a discussion about whether a mesh design could yield more gas, though concerns about gas trapping in the mesh are also raised.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various opinions on electrode materials and methods, with no consensus reached on the best approach. Multiple competing views on the effectiveness and practicality of different materials and techniques remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to material availability, potential toxicity, and the challenges of gas evolution in electrolysis systems. There are also unresolved questions about the long-term performance of suggested materials.

Rhannmah
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I've been trying to build a closed system water electrolyser with easily available materials which allows me to collect the gases separately. To do so, I've been meaning to build an acrylic housing with a textile separator in the middle of two compartments which houses the anode and cathode. The purpose of this is to allow the electrolyte to pass through while leaving the gases separate. I want to build a setup that creates a lot of gas so I don't have to wait hours until i get a liter of gas, so the electrodes will be about 6in x 6in in surface.

The problem I've been having with this project though is selecting the correct electrode material. I have very low monetary resources so I'd like to get some help on this topic before I buy any more materials that would turn out to be a mistake.

I first looked at stainless steel, but I've learned that this produces hexavalent chromium in the electrolyte which can be toxic, so i'd like to avoid that if possible. Also, I question the durability of stainless steel in the long term.

I looked into graphite electrodes, but I'm unsure whether the material is capable of withstanding oxygen production without disintegrating within a couple hours of use. I did some tests with grafoil before investing in isomolded plates; it works well, the quantity of gas produced for a given voltage(5 or 12 volts, as I'm using a computer power supply to power my electrolysis tests) is pretty high, but the "foil"(more like paper)takes water and gets soggy and the graphite erodes really fast and just floats everywhere. Should I expect similar results with graphite electrode plates?

Last thing i looked into is platinum electrodes, which seem to be the best for this application. They don't corrode, they don't erode, they seem to enable gas production the most and they are prohibitively expensive. Would platinized titanium electrodes work just as well without degradation? Are there any voltage/amperage considerations?

Any insight into this topic would be much appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Should this be posted in the Materials and Chemical Engineering forum instead?
 
I expect, regardless of your choice of electrode material, you'll keep coming up against a limit on the volume rate of gas evolution caused by an insulating layer of gas bubbles adhering to the electrode surface. I don't know what is done in industrial gas production, but I think they'd need to be constantly dislodging the bubbles by shaking the electrode (perhaps by sonic vibrations) or directing jets of liquid against it.

I can't comment on suitability of electrode materials, but I expect carbon will erode. Lead can be used in electrolysis, the oxide coating that forms on the anode is itself conductive. Though you imply that toxic contamination may be a problem.
 
Really interesting, NiFe oxide seems really simple until you read the paper that was published recently on the subject that explains how these were built. Seems like a REALLY promising approach though, but I don't think I can do this at home.

NascentOxygen said:
I expect, regardless of your choice of electrode material, you'll keep coming up against a limit on the volume rate of gas evolution caused by an insulating layer of gas bubbles adhering to the electrode surface. I don't know what is done in industrial gas production, but I think they'd need to be constantly dislodging the bubbles by shaking the electrode (perhaps by sonic vibrations) or directing jets of liquid against it.
About this, there are a couple techniques to deal with that problem; sonic emitter seems to be one, using pulsed DC is another. Electrode orientation also helps, if you set it up like horizontal window blinds with the top of each piece of the electrode towards the back, the gas can escape towards the back instead of in front of the electrode where it impedes ion transfer.
 
Also, I'm wondering if a mesh instead of a plate would yield more gas.
 
Actually, thinking about it, I think a mesh, especially a fine one, would be worse because it would trap gas bubbles in the mesh, effectively reducing electrode surface area
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
29K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K