Water wheel model to describe current flow in a circuit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around using a water wheel model to explain concepts related to electric circuits, specifically focusing on ammeters, voltmeters, current, and potential difference. Participants are exploring the strengths and limitations of this analogy in representing electrical phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to map components of the water model to electrical concepts, such as the pump representing a cell and the waterwheel symbolizing an ammeter. Questions arise regarding the model's ability to illustrate resistance and its effects on current flow.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into enhancing the analogy to better represent resistance, suggesting features like projections inside pipes to create turbulence and heat. There is ongoing exploration of how to accurately depict energy loss and the impact of resistance on current flow.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the limitations of the water wheel model, particularly in relation to resistance and energy loss, while adhering to the constraints of the homework context.

Barclay
Messages
207
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


There is a diagram in a book that shows a water pump sending water down a hill that then rotates a water wheel. The water reaches the bottom reservoir and is then carried back up the hill by the pump to start the cycle again.

Q1. Use this model to describe an ammeter, voltmeter, current and potential difference.

Q2. How is this model flawed?

Homework Equations


I'm trying to get a full an answer as possible and have gone overboard compared with the answer in the book. Please can you check my answer.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
A1. The pump represents the cell that is carrying electrons (water) up a hill and is the source of electrical energy. It gives the electrons (water) potential energy by lifting them to a higher level.

Wires are represented by pipes allowing the water to flow.

The current is the amount of water (electrons) flowing.

The potential difference is the height that water (electrons) is pumped up.

The ammeter is represented by the waterwheel. The number of rotations/unit-of-time measures the amount of water flowing past the waterwheel (current). The current is the amount of water (say buckets) passing the wheel each second.

The waterwheel can also represent a bulb where energy is being transferred when it rotates (symbolising light) as water moves past it.

As the water passes the wheel (coulombs of charged electrons) they rotate it and fall to a lower level and lose potential energy.

The height of the hill is the potential available. The height of the drop to the wheel (the component in the circuit) hill is the voltage drop.

Water (electrons) regains its potential energy (potential to do work) as it moves through the pump and is pushed to a higher level (higher potential).

A2. The book says that the model does not show the way current is affected by resistance.
I do not know how this model could show this. Isn't resistance just heat? Heat could be shown as a leaky pipe?
Resistance impedes flow of the water. Perhaps this would be by narrowing the pipes in certain sections of the stream.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Something is needed in the analogy that converts kinetic energy of the water into heat energy. Something that makes the flow turbulent and slows it down might do it. Say lots of little projections from the inside walls of the pipes that break up the flow and make many more particle collisions that become heat in the pipes themselves, which is lost to the environment. It would be best to have the projections not aligned with one another so that there isn't an easy path that allows water to smoothly avoid them all.
 
andrewkirk said:
Something that makes the flow turbulent and slows it down might do it. Say lots of little projections from the inside walls of the pipes that break up the flow and make many more particle collisions that become heat in the pipes themselves, which is lost to the environment. It would be best to have the projections not aligned with one another so that there isn't an easy path that allows water to smoothly avoid them all.

Thanks for the idea. The projections would be the resistance
andrewkirk said:
Something is needed in the analogy that converts kinetic energy of the water into heat energy. Something that makes the flow turbulent and slows it down might do it. Say lots of little projections from the inside walls of the pipes that break up the flow and make many more particle collisions that become heat in the pipes themselves, which is lost to the environment.

The heat has to be shown as something. A leaky pipe suggests coulombs of energy is lost?
 
Barclay said:
The heat has to be shown as something. A leaky pipe suggests coulombs of energy is lost?
No, not a leaky pipe. The heat from the circuit corresponds to heat in the water analog as well.
The impact of increased resistance, given a fixed potential difference, is
(1) a lower rate of current (a lower rate of electron flow), because I = V/R
(2) creation of heat
In this analog that equates to a
(1) a lower rate of water flow, and
(2) creation of heat

The analog of a leaky pipe would be electrons escaping the circuit out into the environment, which is not what resistance does. The analog of a leaky pipe would be a circuit in which some wires had holes in their insulating coating and are in contact with a conducting or semi-conducting material, so that current flows out of the circuit, eg to ground.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
8K