Water's Explosive Expansion: Can It Really Happen?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter grafkendo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of explosive expansion of water through electrical processes, specifically the idea that an electrical spark can separate water molecules without significant heat generation. Participants clarify that this notion aligns with the principles of perpetual motion machines, which violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The consensus is that breaking the hydrogen bonds in water requires more energy than can be extracted from the resulting hydrogen, confirming that the proposed mechanism is not feasible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrogen bonding in water molecules
  • Familiarity with the laws of thermodynamics, particularly the First and Second Laws
  • Basic knowledge of energy conservation principles
  • Awareness of electrical processes and their effects on molecular structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of hydrogen bonding and its implications for molecular behavior
  • Study the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics in detail
  • Explore the concept of perpetual motion machines and their theoretical limitations
  • Investigate the effects of electrical energy on molecular structures in various substances
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, energy researchers, and anyone interested in the scientific principles governing molecular interactions and energy conservation.

grafkendo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This week a coworker and i were killing time between smoke breaks talking about alternative energy, hydrogen fuel cells and what not.

He started telling me about some electrical process that could cause an explosive expansion of water without much heat. he told me a electrical spark delivered in a sertain manner could cause water molecules to push violently apart from each other.

The water dosent vaporise from the heat of the spark but the molecules separate at the hydrogen bond? i guess . it dint click for me but i have no training in physics other than watching Bill nye as a kid. the thing that stands out for me is the heat, i thought that if the water molecules moved away so fast there would just be heat from molecular motion.

The other thing was he told me that the (kenitic) energy released by the shocked water was greater than what it took to spark it up. I am failry sure this is a load of C. i just don't know how to show it and i can't find anything online about it. even withouththe magic energy gain id like to see water do something I've never seen before.

Does anyone know about this stuff?:-p id really liek to squash this before he's got us all building pyramid power hats in the office.

EDIT: thanks for reading my post i still want to know if water can pop like my friend describes i understand that there is probly no energy gain. he probly wouldn't be conviced by the conservation of energy rule because he belives that there is an unseen contributor to the equation that stores/releases the extra energy, i suggested the easter bunny but he didnt comment on it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Look up conservation of energy. What he is talking about is a variation of the perpetual motion machine. The reality is that it always takes more energy to break the bonds in water than you get out in energy content of the H2.

(Now the pyramid power hats on the other hand, I have heard they really work! -- just joking)
 
so can water pop or what?

Thanks for replying to my post i still would like to know if water can behave as my friend described . :approve:
 
Well, interested_learner stated that your friend has in mind something like a perpetual motion machine. These are forbidden by the Second Law of Thermodynamics. So, no. Your friend's machine won't work.

It sounds as if you would get more work out of the process than energy you drew from your reservoir. Of course you were right in thinking it was bull. I don't know what the numbers would be; but it sounds like this would violate the First Law too.

In terms of the water not evaporating — what happens is that when water hits it's phase change temperature, ALL of the energy put into it goes into dissolving those bonds keeping it together. Once that is done, only then can the temperature go up.

(keep in mind, I'm only a college freshman who just got done with Thermodynamics. Correct me, please, if I've made an error somewhere!)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K