Wave eq., two real fields with interaction, wave speed.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interaction between two real fields, R(x,t) and S(x,t), that satisfy the three-dimensional wave equation. It is established that when R and S exhibit symmetric motion, mass-less modes arise, whereas anti-symmetric motion results in massive modes. The interaction potential is defined as V = m(R-S)^2. Additionally, it is noted that in a classical context, the term "mass" should be substituted with "attenuation constant," emphasizing the need for relativistic invariance in the wave equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the three-dimensional wave equation
  • Familiarity with interaction potentials in field theory
  • Knowledge of classical versus quantum field theory distinctions
  • Concept of relativistic invariance in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of mass-less modes in field theory
  • Investigate the role of attenuation constants in classical fields
  • Study the principles of relativistic invariance in wave equations
  • Examine examples of symmetric and anti-symmetric field interactions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in field theory, theoretical physicists exploring wave dynamics, and students studying the implications of symmetry in physical systems.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,231
Reaction score
419
Say we have two real fields, R(x,t) and S(x,t), which satisfy the 3-dimensional wave equation. Now let there be an interaction potential between the fields R and S of the form, V = m(R-S)^2.

Suppose the "motion" of the fields is either symmetric or anti-symmetric, that is R(x,t) = + or - S(x,t).

Then is it true we will have mass-less modes when R and S are symmetric and massive modes when R and S are anti-symmetric?

A one-dimensional example, two superimposed strings with a potential V proportional to the area between the strings squared?

Thank you for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spinnor said:
Say we have two real fields, R(x,t) and S(x,t), which satisfy the 3-dimensional wave equation. Now let there be an interaction potential between the fields R and S of the form, V = m(R-S)^2.

Suppose the "motion" of the fields is either symmetric or anti-symmetric, that is R(x,t) = + or - S(x,t).

Then is it true we will have mass-less modes when R and S are symmetric and massive modes when R and S are anti-symmetric?
I believe that is "correct". However, mass is a result of quantization. If they're just classical fields, then I believe you should replace "mass" with "attenuation (constant)". Oh, and "the wave equation" should be relativistically invariant (or covariant if R and S have internal structure).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
20K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K