Wave function (orbital) rotation matrix

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of wave function rotation matrices in the context of biatomic molecules, specifically examining the wave functions Psi_1 = px(A) + px(B) and Psi_2 = py(A) + py(B). The rotation operator C is defined as C (Psi_1, Psi_2) = R (Psi_1, Psi_2), where R is the rotational matrix of coordinates. It is clarified that "orbital rotation" refers to a unitary transformation among orbitals, represented by \tilde\phi_i(\vec r) = \sum_j U_{ij} \phi_j(\vec r), where U is a unitary matrix. This transformation maintains the invariance of the Slater determinant formed from the orbitals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with unitary transformations and matrices
  • Knowledge of Slater determinants in quantum chemistry
  • Basic concepts of molecular symmetry and orbital theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study unitary transformations in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the construction and properties of Slater determinants
  • Explore molecular symmetry and its implications in quantum chemistry
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of orbital rotation matrices
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical chemists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers focusing on molecular orbital theory and symmetry analysis in biatomic systems.

botee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Dear friends,

I've come across this questions when studying biatomic molecules. Here's my problem:
You have the following two wave functions:

Psi_1 = px(A) + px(B)
Psi_2 = py(A) + py(B)

here px(A) is the px orbital wave function of the A nucleus, px(B) of the B nucleus and so on.

Now we want to rotate these wave functions in order to test their symmetry. I just can't get the way it is done:

C (Psi_1, Psi_2) = R (Psi_1, Psi_2)

here C is the rotation operator, (Psi_1, Psi_2) is a column vector and R is the rotational matrix of coordinates!
Why does this work? If one told me rotate a function, I would rotate the coordinates with the R matrix, not the function values themselves...
Thanks in advance,
botee
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're reading theoretical chemistry text, "orbital rotation" usually does not refer to a rotation of orbitals in actual physical 3D space. Rather, it refers to a unitary transformation amongst the orbitals; that is, you build a new set of orbitals via
[tex]\tilde\phi_i(\vec r) = \sum_j U_{ij} \phi_j(\vec r)[/tex]
where U is a unitary (=orthogonal, in the real case) matrix. This is what is happening here. Note that such a orbital rotation amongst occupied orbitals leaves the Slater determinant build from them invariant.

However, in this particular case this orbital rotation may or may not be equivalent to a rotation in 3D-space (it depends on the orientation of the molecule if it is) .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K