Wave optics interference and diffraction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around measuring the width of a spider web strand using a 650nm laser to create an interference pattern. Participants clarify that the diffraction pattern produced by a single obstruction resembles that of a single opening rather than a double opening. The central maximum appears wider than the higher order fringes, demonstrating the principles of single gap diffraction. The conversation highlights the counterintuitive nature of destructive interference occurring at specific path length differences. Ultimately, the original poster finds a solution to their query.
tink123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Imagine you are trying to measure the width of a single strand of spider web. You have fastened the web to the slide, only rather than mounting the strand vertically as you did with the hair, you have mounted it horizontally. You illuminate the strand with a 650nm laser and project the resulting interference patter onto the wall where you have fastened this piece of paper such that the interference patter strikes within the box below. Given that the strand is 65 um wide and is loacated 2 meters from the wall, draw the resulting interference pattern you would see in the box provided. Draw the pattern to scale in the correct orientation. Include only the m= -2, -1, 0, 1, 2 maxima (bright spots). Indicate the distance between each adjacent maximum.

Okay i have no idea how to do this! someone please help! thank you...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This diffraction pattern will follow the same logic as the diffraction pattern created by light shining through two slits.
 
thank you!
 
What??

A Single obstruction is more like a single opening than like a double opening.

The angles of course are vertical, with the central max in the middle of the shadow.
(see "Poisson's spot" in the index for nice photos)
 
lightgrav said:
What??

A Single obstruction is more like a single opening than like a double opening.

The angles of course are vertical, with the central max in the middle of the shadow.
(see "Poisson's spot" in the index for nice photos)
Hmm you're right. I just did the experiment with my own hair. The central fringe is twice as wide as the higher order fringes which indicates that it is following the (counterintuitive) logic of the single gap diffraction pattern. (counterintuitive in that you get destructive, not constructive, interference at the point where light from the two sides of the barrier have a difference in path length of exactly one wavelength).

Gosh I hope tink comes back!:blushing:
 
don't worry i figured it out! thanks again!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top