Waveforms compatible with transmitting channel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zakee.fancy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Channel Waveforms
Click For Summary
Waveforms must be compatible with transmitting channels to ensure effective communication, as different channels have specific frequency limitations. Sending random waves without understanding their characteristics can lead to signal loss or distortion, especially if the transmission medium has cutoff frequencies. For instance, coaxial cables exhibit significant loss at higher frequencies, while waveguides are ineffective for lower frequency signals. Understanding the properties of both the waveform and the transmission medium is crucial for successful signal transmission. Proper compatibility ensures reliable communication and minimizes transmission issues.
zakee.fancy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
why waveforms should be compatible with transmitting channel?
What if i send a random wave without having much information about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zakee.fancy said:
why waveforms should be compatible with transmitting channel?
What if i send a random wave without having much information about it?

Could you please give more information about your question, and preferably a few examples about the "channels" that you are asking about.

Without knowing more, I would offer that some transmission means have cutoff frequencies. So you may be limited in what frequencies you use. Coax cable is lossy at higher frequencies for example. And waveguides do not pass lower frequency EM signals...
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K