Wavelength approaching the Planck length

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of heating an object to Planck temperature and the resulting electromagnetic wave emissions at Planck length. Participants highlight that current physics theories do not provide clarity on phenomena occurring at these extremes, as they lie far beyond tested theories. It is established that heating an object to Planck temperature would require an astronomical amount of energy, approximately 10^32 Joules for a 1-gram object, which is impractical given humanity's total energy consumption of about 10^21 Joules per year.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck length and Planck temperature
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic wave theory
  • Basic knowledge of thermodynamics and energy requirements
  • Awareness of current limitations in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Planck temperature in theoretical physics
  • Explore the concept of energy scales in quantum mechanics
  • Study the relationship between temperature and electromagnetic radiation
  • Investigate advancements in high-energy physics experiments
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the extreme conditions of the universe and their implications on fundamental physics.

YoungPhysicist
Insights Author
Messages
350
Reaction score
203
If I heat up an object,the object emits a electromagnetic wave with a shorter and shorter wavelength.

But if I heat an object up to Planck temperature, and making the EM wave that it emits has a wavelength of Planck distance,what will happen when I heat it up even more? Will the wavelength become even shorter,or it is not possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Young physicist,
Young physicist said:
planck distance
I assume you mean Planck length.
Young physicist said:
[...]and making the EM wave that it emits has a wavelength of Planck distance,what will happen when I heat it up even more? Will the wavelength become even shorter,or it is not possible?
Do you think the Planck length is the shortest possible length? If so, could you please try to find a good physics source that says so? :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
The Planck length and the Planck temperature are many, many orders of magnitude beyond where are current theories have been tested. So nobody really knows what would happen in the scenario you are asking about. Also, there is no conceivable way to heat up an object to the Planck temperature. To put it into perspective, suppose I had a 1 g object and I wanted to heat it up to the Planck temperature. The object has about 10^23 atoms in it, and each atom would need to have ~kTp of energy, which is ~10^9 Joules. So we would need to impart 10^32 Joules of energy to this 1 g object. Mankind's total energy usage is about 10^21 Joules/year. So you would need to store up our total energy usage for 100 billion years and then give it all to 1 g of matter. Sound feasible?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
phyzguy said:
So we would need to impart 10^32 Joules of energy to this 1 g object. Mankind's total energy usage is about 10^21 Joules/year. So you would need to store up our total energy usage for 100 billion years and then give it all to 1 g of matter. Sound feasible?
Not quite feasible,but still possible:wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
857
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K