Wavelength of light and interference pattern

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the wavelength of light using a diffraction grating, with specific measurements provided for the interference pattern observed on a screen. The context involves analyzing the relationship between the distances to the maxima and the wavelength through relevant equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of equations related to single slit diffraction and diffraction gratings, questioning the appropriateness of approximations used for larger angles. There are attempts to set up equations based on the distances to the maxima, with some participants expressing confusion about the interpretation of the measurements.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided calculations and expressed uncertainty about their approaches. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the definitions of the distances involved and the implications of using approximations in the equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding focusing on the first maxima and the limitations of certain approximations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for discussion. There is an ongoing examination of the definitions and assumptions related to the measurements of y1 and y2, as well as the implications of using specific equations for diffraction patterns.

abeltyukov
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The interference pattern on a screen 1.2 m behind a 710 line/mm diffraction grating is shown in Figure P22.45 (http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q208/infinitbelt/p22-45alt.gif ), in which y1 = 52.3 cm and y2 = 107.6 cm. What is the wavelength of the light?


2. The attempt at a solution

I believe that is a single slit diffraction grating. Thus the equation is a*sin(theta) = m(lambda), right? I then have sin(theta) = y/L Where do I go from there?

I tried having two equations (one for y1 and one for y2) and setting them equal to one another by setting them individually equal to a. But that did not get me the right answer.


Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show more of your calculation?
 
Last edited:
hage567 said:
Can you show more of your calculation?

I had:

a*(y1 / L) = m1*lambda
a*(y2 / L) = m2*lambda

(lambda*L) / y1 = (2*lambda*L) / y2

lambda = [(y2)(L)] / [(y1)(L)]


Is that right?


Thanks!
 
y2 is not the total distance to the second maximum from the centre, it is the distance between the first order and second order maxima. Also, be careful of the approximation of sin(theta) = y/L. That doesn't work when the angle gets too large. So that is something to consider.
 
hage567 said:
y2 is not the total distance to the second maximum from the centre, it is the distance between the first order and second order maxima. Also, be careful of the approximation of sin(theta) = y/L. That doesn't work when the angle gets too large. So that is something to consider.

So should y2 be y2 + y1? I am still a bit confused.

Thanks!
 
This experiment uses a diffraction grating, and you need to use the equations for that. You should focus on the first (closest to center) maxima. As hage567 has mentioned, the equations are only approximations based on the fact that (sin x = x) for small values of x. If you are using large angles, then your equations will not be accurate.

This page has a good geometric explanation for the equation you mentioned.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/gratcal.html
 
mezarashi said:
This experiment uses a diffraction grating, and you need to use the equations for that. You should focus on the first (closest to center) maxima. As hage567 has mentioned, the equations are only approximations based on the fact that (sin x = x) for small values of x. If you are using large angles, then your equations will not be accurate.

This page has a good geometric explanation for the equation you mentioned.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/gratcal.html

Thanks! I got the right answer but am still not sure why. Here's what I did:

y = ((lambda)*(L)) / d

((0.523 * 1.408E-6) / 1.2) - (1.076E-7 - 0.523E-7) = 558.5 nm.


Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K