Weierstrass M-test Homework: 0<p<1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kate2010
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the convergence of a series defined by a parameter \( p \) where \( 0 < p < 1 \). The original poster is tasked with showing that a series converges uniformly on the interval \([-1, 0]\) using the Weierstrass M-test.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the convergence of the series and expresses uncertainty about the case when \( x = -1 \). Some participants discuss the application of the Weierstrass M-test and the nature of the series terms, questioning the signs and convergence properties.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the series' behavior, particularly regarding the signs of the terms and the implications for uniform convergence. There is a suggestion that the original series may be strictly negative, and a participant confirms that the conditions for the M-test can still be satisfied under certain transformations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity regarding the behavior of the series at the endpoint \( x = -1 \), and participants are considering how this impacts the application of the M-test. The discussion reflects a mix of assumptions about the series' terms and their convergence properties.

Kate2010
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



0<p<1
Suppose [tex]\sum[/tex][tex]^{infinity}_{k=0}[/tex] p(p-1)...(p-k+1)(-1)k/k(k-1)...1 is convergent.
Show that [tex]\sum[/tex][tex]^{infinity}_{k=0}[/tex] p(p-1)...(p-k+1)(x)k/k(k-1)...1 is uniformly convergent on [-1,0]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have shown that p(p-1)...(p-k+1)(-1)k/k(k-1)...1 < 0 for k=1,2,3,...
[tex]\sum[/tex][tex]^{infinity}_{k=0}[/tex] p(p-1)...(p-k+1)(-1)k/k(k-1)...1 = L (< 0) as it converges to a limit.
|(-1)krk|[tex]\leq[/tex] rk for r<1 and -1<x[tex]\leq[/tex]0
However, I do not know how to tackle the case when x=-1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
remember the wierstrass m-test holds for the absolute value of the functions in the sequence. furthermore the first series is not strictly negative it is strictly positive this has to do with the parity between the p-k terms and (-1)^k. therefore the m-test really is applicable. i.e. the absolute value of the terms in the second series really are less than the corresponding terms in the first. hence uniform convergence.
 
note as you mentioned for the case x=-1 the terms are equal and this is acceptable condition for the m-test
 
I'm pretty sure the 1st series is strictly negative as it was a show that question. Could I just consider the negative of that series?
 
you can. sorry i misread the sum. yeah if you multiply by negative -1 the series converges by m-test. then since the negative of the series converges then a constant multiple of the series (by -1) also converges to the negative of the limit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K