Weight of copper hanging/submerged

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mattc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Copper Weight
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the buoyancy of a copper object submerged in fresh water. A scale initially reads 220N when the copper is hanging, and the volume of the copper is calculated to be 0.0025m³. The buoyant force acting on the copper can be determined using the formula for buoyancy, which states that the buoyant force equals the weight of the displaced fluid. Given the density of fresh water at 1000 kg/m³, the scale will read 220N minus the buoyant force when the copper is submerged.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyancy principles
  • Knowledge of density calculations
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams
  • Basic grasp of Newton's laws of motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the buoyant force using the formula: Buoyant Force = Volume of Displaced Fluid × Density of Fluid × Gravitational Acceleration
  • Explore Archimedes' principle and its applications in fluid mechanics
  • Learn how to draw and interpret free body diagrams in physics
  • Study the relationship between weight, mass, and gravitational force
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone interested in fluid mechanics and the principles of buoyancy.

Mattc
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A scale reads 220N when a piece of copper is hanging from it. What does the scale read when it is lowered so the copper is submerged in fresh water.

From a given chart

Density:
copper is 8930 kg/m^3
fresh water is 1000kg/m^3

I found my volume of copper to be .0025m^3

I'm just not sure which direction to go now?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What forces are involved in buoyancy? Draw a free body diagram. Also write down the definition of buoyancy? Does anything click?
 
Since when was volume measured in Kg?
 
The forces involved are those from bottom and those on top of object. I have drawn the diagram and I think I know the connection I'm trying to make. The volume of the displaced fluid times density has to relate to the buoyant force? I think its the Newtons that's throwing me off
 
Integral said:
Since when was volume measured in Kg?

indeed my teach would've smacked me
 
geezzzz nevermind I got it. I thought i was looking over something simple.While obtaining the forces I was neglecting my 9.8m/s^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
10K