Hello everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I don't get how the second-order derivative ##\partial^2 S/\partial x_i \partial x_j## of the phase S arrives here. If one performs a power series expansion of the Hamiltonian around ##\nabla S##, then I do get where the first term ##A## comes from, but then adding higher-order derivatives doesn't seem to introduce this second-order derivative of the phase S (even taking the somewhat

fuzzy footnote into account).

Does anyone who has read this book have an idea?

Thanks in advance.

Pierre

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Weinberg Lectures in QM (2013 Ed.), Equation 7.10.15

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Weinberg Lectures Equation | Date |
---|---|

I Weinberg and Ray Transformations – Ch2 App A. | Feb 23, 2018 |

A Weinberg: detecting changes to QM using atomic clocks | Feb 12, 2017 |

A Stephen Weinberg on Understanding Quantum Mechanics | Jan 4, 2017 |

I Weinberg Lectures on QM (2013 ed.), Equation 6.5.5 | Mar 6, 2016 |

Weinberg Lectures on QM (2013 ed.), Equation 3.6.18 | Feb 18, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**