Weird Depictions of Birefringence with Angle of Incidence 0°

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter greypilgrim
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of birefringence, specifically addressing the confusion surrounding the depiction of refraction at an angle of incidence of 0°. Users reference Snell's law, which states that the angle of refraction should also be 0° under normal incidence. However, it is established that in birefringent materials, the extraordinary ray propagates at an angle, leading to apparent discrepancies in visual representations. Key resources include Wikipedia and Physics Bootcamp for further clarification on double refraction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Snell's Law in optics
  • Familiarity with birefringence and its implications
  • Knowledge of extraordinary and ordinary rays in anisotropic materials
  • Basic principles of light refraction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of Snell's Law
  • Explore the properties of anisotropic materials and their optical behavior
  • Study the applications of birefringence in optical devices
  • Learn about the experimental methods to observe birefringence
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, optical engineers, and researchers interested in the properties of light and materials exhibiting birefringence.

greypilgrim
Messages
581
Reaction score
44
Hi.
Some results for "birefringence" in Google Image Search look odd to me:
1746044402393.jpeg
1746044417109.jpeg
1746044459215.jpeg


Aren't they wrong? Why would there be refraction if the angle of indicence is 0°?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Tom.G said:
@greypilgrim The relevant section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birefringence#Double_refraction
wikipedia said:
So even in the case of normal incidence, where one would compute the angle of refraction as zero (according to Snell's law, regardless of the effective index of refraction), the energy of the extraordinary ray is propagated at an angle.
See also:
https://www.physicsbootcamp.org/section-birefrengence.html
physicsbootcamp said:
Clearly, one of these directions is consistent with Snell’s law of refraction, and the other is not.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K