I Weird Depictions of Birefringence with Angle of Incidence 0°

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter greypilgrim
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Birefringence involves the phenomenon of double refraction, where light splits into two rays when passing through certain materials. Even at normal incidence (0° angle), the extraordinary ray propagates at a different angle, which can seem counterintuitive. This behavior aligns with Snell's law, although one ray's direction may not conform to typical refraction principles. The discussion highlights the complexity of birefringence and the need for careful interpretation of related images and diagrams. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate analysis in optics.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
Hi.
Some results for "birefringence" in Google Image Search look odd to me:
1746044402393.jpeg
1746044417109.jpeg
1746044459215.jpeg


Aren't they wrong? Why would there be refraction if the angle of indicence is 0°?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tom.G said:
@greypilgrim The relevant section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birefringence#Double_refraction
wikipedia said:
So even in the case of normal incidence, where one would compute the angle of refraction as zero (according to Snell's law, regardless of the effective index of refraction), the energy of the extraordinary ray is propagated at an angle.
See also:
https://www.physicsbootcamp.org/section-birefrengence.html
physicsbootcamp said:
Clearly, one of these directions is consistent with Snell’s law of refraction, and the other is not.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top