Other Well Written Materials Science / Engineering Books?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding a materials science textbook comparable to Taylor's Classical Mechanics, which is praised for its clarity, problem sets, and focused content. Participants note that materials science inherently covers a broader range of topics, making it less likely to find a single comprehensive text akin to Taylor's. Instead, specialized texts are recommended for in-depth study of individual subjects such as crystallography, thermodynamics, and mechanical properties. Specific titles mentioned include Haasens' "Physical Metallurgy," Jaeger's "Elasticity, Fracture and Flow," Gould's "Introduction to Linear Elasticity," Hull and Bacon's "Introduction to Dislocations," and Hutchings' "Tribology." The conversation emphasizes the need for targeted resources rather than a single overarching textbook.
SphericalCow
Messages
25
Reaction score
3
I would love to find a materials book that is comparable to Taylor's Classical Mechanics.

Taylor's book is well written with good problem sets, and it's designed for undergraduates. I also like that it burrows into one subject for 300 pages instead of being a general textbook with 2000 pages.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But a textbook on "materials science and engineering" would inherently cover a range of subjects, more comparable to, e.g., Halliday and Resnick (or whatever it's called these days) for physics, not Taylor's Classical Mechanics. For in-depth treatment of individual subjects, you would need specialized individual texts on, e.g., crystallography, chemical thermodynamics, phase transformations, mechanical properties of materials, optical properties of materials, ....
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Tried to keep the page length down

Haasen Physical Metallurgy
Jaeger Elasticity, Fracture and Flow (warning the notation is dated)
Gould Introduction to Linear Elasticity
Hull and Bacon Introduction to Dislocations
Hutchings Tribology
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and SphericalCow
CrysPhys said:
But a textbook on "materials science and engineering" would inherently cover a range of subjects, more comparable to, e.g., Halliday and Resnick (or whatever it's called these days) for physics, not Taylor's Classical Mechanics. For in-depth treatment of individual subjects, you would need specialized individual texts on, e.g., crystallography, chemical thermodynamics, phase transformations, mechanical properties of materials, optical properties of materials, ....
Yes, this is exactly what I want. Thank you!
 
Frabjous said:
Tried to keep the page length down

Haasen Physical Metallurgy
Jaeger Elasticity, Fracture and Flow (warning the notation is dated)
Gould Introduction to Linear Elasticity
Hull and Bacon Introduction to Dislocations
Hutchings Tribology
Thank you Frabjous!
 
Hello Intellectuals! So far it seems to be reasonable to learn mathematics in a rigorous way by not solely considering the techniques of problem solving or the applications of a particular subject or concept. Also to truly appreciate the beauty of mathematical endeavor one need to learn the reasoning behind the origination of concepts in mathematics, so as a beginner it appears to be worthwhile to learn the highly abstract aspects of mathematics like proofs, logic, and topics in pure...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K