Well Written Materials Science / Engineering Books?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the search for well-written materials science and engineering textbooks that are comparable to Taylor's Classical Mechanics, particularly in terms of depth and clarity for undergraduate students.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire for a materials book similar to Taylor's Classical Mechanics, highlighting its clarity and focused subject matter.
  • Another participant argues that a materials science and engineering textbook would necessarily cover a broader range of topics, suggesting that individual specialized texts would be needed for in-depth understanding of specific subjects like crystallography and phase transformations.
  • Several titles are proposed as potential resources, including Haasen's Physical Metallurgy, Jaeger's Elasticity, Fracture and Flow, Gould's Introduction to Linear Elasticity, Hull and Bacon's Introduction to Dislocations, and Hutchings' Tribology.
  • One participant acknowledges the need for specialized texts and expresses gratitude for the suggestions provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to disagree on whether a single comprehensive textbook can meet the needs of those seeking a focused approach similar to Taylor's work, with some advocating for specialized texts instead.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the limitations of textbooks in covering a wide range of subjects within materials science and engineering, suggesting that depth may be sacrificed for breadth.

SphericalCow
Messages
25
Reaction score
3
I would love to find a materials book that is comparable to Taylor's Classical Mechanics.

Taylor's book is well written with good problem sets, and it's designed for undergraduates. I also like that it burrows into one subject for 300 pages instead of being a general textbook with 2000 pages.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But a textbook on "materials science and engineering" would inherently cover a range of subjects, more comparable to, e.g., Halliday and Resnick (or whatever it's called these days) for physics, not Taylor's Classical Mechanics. For in-depth treatment of individual subjects, you would need specialized individual texts on, e.g., crystallography, chemical thermodynamics, phase transformations, mechanical properties of materials, optical properties of materials, ....
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Tried to keep the page length down

Haasen Physical Metallurgy
Jaeger Elasticity, Fracture and Flow (warning the notation is dated)
Gould Introduction to Linear Elasticity
Hull and Bacon Introduction to Dislocations
Hutchings Tribology
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and SphericalCow
CrysPhys said:
But a textbook on "materials science and engineering" would inherently cover a range of subjects, more comparable to, e.g., Halliday and Resnick (or whatever it's called these days) for physics, not Taylor's Classical Mechanics. For in-depth treatment of individual subjects, you would need specialized individual texts on, e.g., crystallography, chemical thermodynamics, phase transformations, mechanical properties of materials, optical properties of materials, ....
Yes, this is exactly what I want. Thank you!
 
Frabjous said:
Tried to keep the page length down

Haasen Physical Metallurgy
Jaeger Elasticity, Fracture and Flow (warning the notation is dated)
Gould Introduction to Linear Elasticity
Hull and Bacon Introduction to Dislocations
Hutchings Tribology
Thank you Frabjous!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K