What Am I Doing Wrong in My Coulomb's Law Calculations?

[exitwound]

Coulomb's Law on a line...again.

Homework Statement

Homework Equations

E=\frac{kQ}{d^2}

The Attempt at a Solution

I've been working on this one for three days now and can't come up with a valid answer.

I've broken this problem up into two sections, one for the upper ring segment, and one for the bottom ring segment.

Upper Segment[/size]

E=\frac{kQ}{d^2} \\Coulomb's Law
dQ=\lambda ds \\charge on the differential
ds= R d\Theta \\area of the differential

dE=\frac{kdQ}{d^2}
dE=\frac{k\lambda R d\Theta}{R^2}

E=\int_0^{\pi /2}dE \\Electric field is the sum of all the differential electric fields.

E=\int_0^{\pi /2}\frac{k\lambda R d\Theta}{R^2}

E=\frac{k\lambda R}{R^2}\int_0^{\pi /2}d\Theta

E=\frac{k\lambda}{R}\int_0^{\pi /2}d\Theta

E=\frac{k\lambda}{R}(\pi/2 - 0)

E=\frac{k\lambda \pi}{2R}

\lambda = \frac{Q}{L}
\lambda = \frac{Q}{\frac{R\pi}{2}}

E=\frac{2kQ \pi}{2\pi R^2}

E=\frac{kQ}{R^2}

E=\frac{(9E9)(5.5E^-12)}{(.0150)^2}=220 N/C

This is the Electric field generated by the upper segmant of the ring. The angle at which it points is 45 degrees below horizon, or 315 degrees.

Lower Segment[/size]

The lower segment is identical. The same charge magnitude exists on the ring. The distance is the same to the ring. The only difference is the direction of the resulting force because the charge on the ring is negative. Therefore, the Electric field is also 220 N/C but its direction is towards the ring, or 135 degrees.

Both Segments[/size]

The resulting forces added together produce a direction directly down, or 270 degrees from horizontal. Since we have canceling x-components of the two forces, the y-components are all that matter.

E_y=Esin(45) = 220 sin(45) = 155.56 \\Ey component of upper half.
E_y=Esin(45) = 220 sin(45) = 155.56 \\Ey component of lower half.

Added together, is 311.13 N\C in the 270 degree direction.

What am I doing wrong??

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Well, you have dE=\frac{\lambda k d\theta}{R}, but just like the total field, each infinitesimal portion of the field will be a vector, so you need to find d\textbf{E} and integrate that in order to find \textbf{E}...you will find that the x-component integrates to zero, consistent with your answer to (b) and the y component integrates to something negative

 

[exitwound]

so you're saying I need to do this?

dE=\frac{\lambda k cos \Theta d\Theta}{R}

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Sort of, dE\cos\theta will give you a component of d\textbf{E}, but which component (+x,+y,-x,or -y component)?

 

[exitwound]

I'm lost then. I have no idea.

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Color in a small section of your wire (in the upper region) and call that section dQ, label the angle \theta however you want, and draw a vector from dQ to P...Colulomb's law tells you that the field d\textbf{E} due to dQ points along that vector right? What component of that will point in the x-direction? How about the y-direction?

 

[exitwound]

This is what I've been doing. You should see my pages and pages of pictures.

Upper section:
(I'm taking Theta to be from the +y axis towards the -x axis)

E points in the 315 degree direction.
The y-component of that would be Ecos(Theta).
The x-component of that would be Esin(Theta).

 

[gabbagabbahey]

This is what I've been doing. You should see my pages and pages of pictures.

How about I show you one of mine instead...

http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/7655/efield.th.jpg

You should see clearly, that the x-component of d\text{E} is dE_x=dE\sin\theta while the y-component is dE_y=-dE\cos\theta...right?

 

[exitwound]

Indeed. I left the negative off the cos because I knew the direction. My picture looks identical to yours.

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Okay, so integrate now...what do you get for the components of the field due to the upper section of wire?

 

[exitwound]

E=\int_0^{\pi/2}\frac{k\lambda (-cos\Theta) d\Theta}{R}

E=\frac{-k\lambda}{R}\int_0^{\pi/2}cos\Theta d\Theta

E=\frac{-k\lambda}{R}(sin\Theta|_0^{\pi/2})

E=\frac{-k\lambda}{R}(1-0)

E=\frac{-k\lambda}{R}

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Well that's E_y...you know from symmetry that E_x from the upper section should cancel E_x from the lower section, so you don't have to calculate each E_x but you probably shuld anyways, so that you can check that the two do in fact cancel (if they don't then you know you've done something wrong)

Anyway, what about E_y from the lower segment...what do you get for that?

 

[exitwound]

E=\int_0^{\pi/2} dE sin(\Theta)

E=\frac{k\lambda}{R}\int_0^{\pi/2}sin\Theta d\Theta

E=\frac{k\lambda}{R}(-cos\Theta|_{\pi/2}^{\pi}) \\\\or from 0-->pi/2

E=\frac{k\lambda}{R}(0-1)

E=\frac{-k\lambda}{R}

Which is the same magnitude as the upper half, which makes sense.

(I have to get to bed. I'll check back in the morning. Thanks for the help so far.)

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Right, so the total field is____?

 

[exitwound]

<br /> E=\frac{-2k\lambda}{R}<br />

where \lambda = Q/L where L= R*pi/2

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Right, now plug in the numbers...what do you get for |E| ?

 

[exitwound]

-280.14 n/c