What Am I Doing Wrong with Perpendicular Mirror Image Positions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of image positions formed by two perpendicular mirrors. The user initially calculated the image coordinates as (-1,2), (1,-2), and (1,2), while the textbook provides different coordinates: (-1,1), (1,-2), and (1,2). The user expresses confusion regarding the correct method for determining image positions and the reflection of light rays from the mirrors. The key misunderstanding lies in the application of the mirror reflection principle, specifically regarding the distance of the image from the mirror surface.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric optics principles
  • Knowledge of mirror reflection laws
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinates
  • Ability to visualize light ray paths
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the laws of reflection in optics
  • Learn about image formation in multiple mirrors
  • Explore the concept of virtual images and their properties
  • Practice problems involving perpendicular mirrors and image positions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of image formation using mirrors.

bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0
perpmirrors.jpg
perpmirrorsray.jpg


Homework Statement


In the figure are two perpendicular mirrors. The origin is shown by the axes. I am asked to find the positions of each of the images that the observer at point O sees.

The coordinates that I found were (-1,2) , (1,-2) , and (1,2),
however, my book insists that the answers are (-1,1), (1,-2), and (1,2)

What am I doing wrong? I am a little bit unsure as far as drawing my rays for the image formed when light reflects off both mirrors. Do the lines extended behind the mirror surface have to meet?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
any thoughts would be appreciated?
 
It seems to me that the image has to be an equal length on the other side of the mirror as the object is from the surface. So the image behind the top mirror would be 2 m behind and 1 m to the left of the origin. Thus (-1,2). Why doesn't my book have this as one of the answers? And I don't know where they got (-1,1). Am I misunderstanding something?
 
nevermind, the book is wrong
 
3 adjacent perpendicular mirrors Question.

if three mutually _l_ mirrors r placed adjacent to each other then for a person standing in front of them number of images formed = 7.

cheers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K