What are alternative methods for accessing blocked websites?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mech-eng
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Free methods for accessing blocked websites include using the Tor browser, which offers anonymity and is effective in bypassing censorship, particularly in restrictive regions like Turkey. Changing DNS settings may work for some sites but often fails for others, such as Wikipedia, due to potential interception of DNS requests or blocking of specific IP ranges. Proxy servers can also be utilized; they connect users to sites from countries without restrictions, although they may be slow and temporary. VPNs are popular for encrypting communications and bypassing country restrictions, but their use can be noticeable to network administrators. Additionally, Google’s web cache can be a workaround to access certain pages without revealing the original site visited. However, both Tor and VPNs have limitations regarding traffic monitoring and may not fully protect user privacy.
  • #31
rootone said:
The OP says that Wikipedia is censored/banned in Turkey.
WWGD said:
Is it even technically possible?
2017 block of Wikipedia in Turkey ...
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #32
  • #33
mech-eng said:
But I know changing DNS can work very well with some sites but what is the reason that it does not work for wikipedia?

Thank you.
DNS requests are sent in cleartext and are likely being intercepted, or the Wikipedia IP ranges are being blocked. The main issue I see with using proxies/VPN/Tor to access restricted content is their use is very noticeable from the network administator's perspective, and I think it's best to stay off their radar if possible.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
stoomart said:
DNS requests are sent in cleartext and are likely being intercepted. The main issue I see with using proxies/VPN/Tor to access restricted content is their use is very noticeable from the network administator's perspective, and I think it's best to stay off their radar if possible.

Tor also ?
 
  • #35
Buffu said:
Tor also ?
Yes, Tor is really just an anonymizing VPN that prevents the target server from knowing where you connected from, but the traffic from your client to the entry node is trivial to identify as Tor traffic by its signature/fingerprint.

Like all current low-latency anonymity networks, Tor cannot and does not attempt to protect against monitoring of traffic at the boundaries of the Tor network (i.e., the traffic entering and exiting the network). While Tor does provide protection against traffic analysis, it cannot prevent traffic confirmation (also called end-to-end correlation).​

 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #36
If you don't want to use tor or a vpn, you could still use googles web cache. i.e. go to google.com and type in "cache:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_block_of_Wikipedia_in_Turkey"
Since the connection between your browser and google is encrypted, there should be no way to tell that you used wikipedia. Even if your ISP logs all your activity, all they will see is that you connected to googles servers.

edit: I just noticed, typing in "cache:..." into google will redirect you to an unencrypted http site for some reason. Therefore it's better to type in the correct url directly https://webcache.googleusercontent....ia.org/wiki/2017_block_of_Wikipedia_in_Turkey
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DonaldSilver and WWGD
  • #37
Thread is closed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K