What are alternative methods for accessing blocked websites?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mech-eng
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on alternative methods for accessing blocked websites, particularly in regions with internet censorship like Turkey. Users recommend several tools, including the Tor browser for anonymity, VPNs for bypassing restrictions, and Google DNS for some sites. However, it is noted that DNS changes may not work for all websites, such as Wikipedia, due to potential IP blocking or interception of DNS requests. The conversation highlights the limitations of these methods and the importance of staying off network administrators' radars when attempting to access restricted content.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Tor browser functionality and its anonymity features.
  • Familiarity with VPN services and their role in bypassing internet restrictions.
  • Knowledge of DNS protocols and how they can be manipulated for access.
  • Awareness of web caching techniques, particularly using Google’s web cache.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the security features and limitations of the Tor browser.
  • Explore various VPN services and their effectiveness in different countries.
  • Learn about DNS over HTTPS (DoH) and its advantages for privacy.
  • Investigate web caching methods and how to effectively use them to access blocked content.
USEFUL FOR

Individuals living in regions with internet censorship, cybersecurity enthusiasts, and anyone seeking to bypass geographical restrictions on web content.

  • #31
rootone said:
The OP says that Wikipedia is censored/banned in Turkey.
WWGD said:
Is it even technically possible?
2017 block of Wikipedia in Turkey ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #32
  • #33
mech-eng said:
But I know changing DNS can work very well with some sites but what is the reason that it does not work for wikipedia?

Thank you.
DNS requests are sent in cleartext and are likely being intercepted, or the Wikipedia IP ranges are being blocked. The main issue I see with using proxies/VPN/Tor to access restricted content is their use is very noticeable from the network administator's perspective, and I think it's best to stay off their radar if possible.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
stoomart said:
DNS requests are sent in cleartext and are likely being intercepted. The main issue I see with using proxies/VPN/Tor to access restricted content is their use is very noticeable from the network administator's perspective, and I think it's best to stay off their radar if possible.

Tor also ?
 
  • #35
Buffu said:
Tor also ?
Yes, Tor is really just an anonymizing VPN that prevents the target server from knowing where you connected from, but the traffic from your client to the entry node is trivial to identify as Tor traffic by its signature/fingerprint.

Like all current low-latency anonymity networks, Tor cannot and does not attempt to protect against monitoring of traffic at the boundaries of the Tor network (i.e., the traffic entering and exiting the network). While Tor does provide protection against traffic analysis, it cannot prevent traffic confirmation (also called end-to-end correlation).​

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #36
If you don't want to use tor or a vpn, you could still use googles web cache. i.e. go to google.com and type in "cache:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_block_of_Wikipedia_in_Turkey"
Since the connection between your browser and google is encrypted, there should be no way to tell that you used wikipedia. Even if your ISP logs all your activity, all they will see is that you connected to googles servers.

edit: I just noticed, typing in "cache:..." into google will redirect you to an unencrypted http site for some reason. Therefore it's better to type in the correct url directly https://webcache.googleusercontent....ia.org/wiki/2017_block_of_Wikipedia_in_Turkey
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DonaldSilver and WWGD
  • #37
Thread is closed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K