What are Lambda and Z Parameters in Ultrasound B-mode Imaging?

AI Thread Summary
Lambda in ultrasound B-mode imaging is defined as 513 x 10^-6 m, with ZR values of 1.2 cm and 1 cm, leading to different calculations for LR based on whether Z is less than or greater than ZR. When Z is less than ZR, LR equals D, which is 0.5 cm; when Z exceeds ZR, LR is calculated using the formula involving the tangent function. The discussion also touches on the time calculation t = Z/c, resulting in 77.9 x 10^-6 s. Participants emphasize the importance of clarifying the variables used in the equations for better understanding. Overall, the conversation highlights the mathematical relationships in ultrasound imaging parameters.
nao113
Messages
68
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
1. The transducer array of a linear-array real-time imaging instrument has 32 unfocused elements. Each element is 0.5 cm wide, and there is a nonradiating gap of 0.5 cm between neighboring elements. Only one element at a time is excited.
a) At a frequency of 3 MHz, find the lateral resolution of this instrument at a depth of 1 cm and a depth of 8 cm. The lateral resolution of a linear- array imager is given by the beam size or the line spacing, whichever is larger.
Use relationship:
c = 1540 m/s, c =frequency x l
b) If echo information out to a depth of 12 cm is desired, calculate the minimum time required to scan the entire array.
Relevant Equations
Z < ZR => LR = D
Z > ZR => LR = 2 tan(sin-1 lambda/D) x Z
Screen Shot 2022-05-26 at 19.16.11.png


a. lambda = 513 X 10^-6 m
ZR = 1, 2 cm
Z = 1 cm => Z < ZR => LR = D = 0.5 cm
Z = 8 cm => Z > ZR => LR = 2 tan(sin^-1 (lambda/D)) x Z
= 2 tan(sin^-1 (513 x 10^-6 m/0.005 m)) x 0.08
= 1.65 cm

b. t = Z/c => 0.12/1540 = 77.9 x 10^-6 s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It won't hurt to actually explain what all these letters mean in your equations. This in case you have some question, eventually. So far I don't see the purpose of your post.
 
nasu said:
It won't hurt to actually explain what all these letters mean in your equations. This in case you have some question, eventually. So far I don't see the purpose of your post.
Hello, thank you for the advice, I already changed it, I wonder whether I answered them correctly or not.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top