Insights What Are Numbers? - Insights for Beginners

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the publication of an insights article titled "What Are Numbers," aimed at beginners who have completed some Calculus but lack knowledge in abstract algebra. The author, Bill, addresses previous issues with advanced content and introduces a new approach to teaching foundational concepts in mathematics, including natural numbers, integers, and rational numbers. Additionally, Bill mentions an upcoming article based on the book "Precalculus Made Difficult," which consolidates Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2, and Precalculus into a two-year curriculum. He emphasizes the importance of calculus in understanding certain mathematical concepts and recommends studying "Full Frontal Calculus" for further learning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of Calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with natural numbers, integers, and rational numbers
  • Knowledge of set theory
  • Introduction to complex numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "What Are Numbers" for foundational insights
  • Study "Precalculus Made Difficult" to grasp integrated mathematics concepts
  • Learn about Euler's relation in complex numbers
  • Explore "Full Frontal Calculus" for advanced calculus preparation
USEFUL FOR

Students transitioning from basic Calculus to more advanced mathematical concepts, educators seeking effective teaching materials, and anyone interested in a comprehensive understanding of foundational mathematics.

Messages
10,968
Reaction score
3,838
Hi Everyone

I have been doing further investigation into infinitesimals since I wrote my insight article.

I had an issue with the original article; the link to the foundations of natural numbers, integers, and rational numbers was somewhat advanced. I did need to write an insights article at a level more appropriate to a beginning student who has done some Calculus - but no abstract algebra.

At the same time, my article on infinitesimals had issues since learning more about the subject.

It took a while, but I completed an insights article rectifying both issues, which is now published - What Are Numbers.

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-are-numbers/

I will leave my original article alone for now but will eventually delete it as this replaces it.

I will shortly publish an insights article based on an interesting book called Precalculus Made Difficult.

It is different from the usual precalculus text in that it covers in the US what is called Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2, and Precalculus in one text. Instead of taking 4 years to cover the material, IMHO, an average student can do it in 2 years; a good student could do it in a year. The text has some 'issues' in that it uses things like 2^x without first defining 2^x, where x is a real number. There is only one way to fix this - with calculus. So when it reaches that point in the text, I introduce calculus and define it properly. This also includes an introduction to set theory and infinitesimals, but at a level, I believe appropriate for the audience.

After that is done, the rest of the text is studied. It, however, does not introduce complex numbers. To fix that, I included a section on complex numbers with a bit of a calculus flavour eg prove Euler's famous relation.

This provides, again, IMHO, good preparation to study the author's associated calculus text - Full Frontal Calculus.

Precalculus More Difficult is available for free. The associated calculus text Full Frontal Calculus was free but now costs $9.00 - still rather cheap. Both are available as books from Amazon and would be my preference unless money is an issue.

If the reader has not done calculus, that article, and Full Frontal Calculus, should be studied before tackling this article.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes Ssnow, Drakkith and fresh_42
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K