What are some comprehensive and reliable books on Ancient History?

  • Context: History 
  • Thread starter Thread starter qspeechc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books History
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for comprehensive and reliable books on Ancient History, particularly focusing on European history but open to broader world history. Participants express interest in texts that are not encyclopedic in nature and seek suggestions that cover periods before the 2nd century AD.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions owning several history books but seeks recommendations for those covering ancient history before the 2nd century AD, expressing a preference for comprehensive yet not encyclopedic texts.
  • Another participant suggests Scullard's history of the Roman Republic as a standard work still used in English-speaking history curricula.
  • A different participant recommends "History of the Roman People" by Ward, Heichelheim, and Yeo, describing it as an enjoyable textbook for Roman history and suggests exploring primary sources like Suetonius and Plutarch, while noting the need for critical reading of such texts.
  • A later reply emphasizes the difficulty in finding reliable sources of ancient history that are supported by archaeological and historical evidence, while reiterating the value of the Cambridge Ancient History as a resource.
  • This participant expresses particular interest in the Neolithic period through the Middle Ages.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on specific texts and their reliability, indicating that there is no consensus on a single recommended book or approach to studying ancient history.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of understanding the context and bias of historical authors and translators when engaging with ancient texts, suggesting limitations in the reliability of certain sources.

qspeechc
Messages
839
Reaction score
15
Hi guys

I own several history books, but none covering history before the 2nd century AD. Well, that's not true, I have Low's abridgement of Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, but nobody reads that to learn history, they only read it for Gibbon's writting. Any recommendations? Specifically of European history, but quite broad (meaning if it covers world history it's fine) and comprehensive, but not encyclopaedic (do I sound picky?). There's the Cambridge Ancient History, but that spans over ten volumes! Any suggestions are much appreciated, thanks.

qspeechc
 
Science news on Phys.org
Depends a bit on what you are after.

Scullard's history of the Roman Republic from the origins up to the establishment of the Principate is a standard work, still used extensively in history curriculae at English-speaking countries.
 
The "History of the Roman People" by Ward, Heichelheim, and Yeo is an excellent survey of Roman history, if you're into that. I'm actually using it for a class on the Roman Empire, and it's one of the most enjoyable reads I've ever had from a textbook.

I would also recommend looking into primary sources, which can be really fun (though you sometimes must take them with a grain of salt!). Suetonius is amazing, as are Plutarch, Cassius Dio, etc.
 
qspeechc said:
Hi guys

I own several history books, but none covering history before the 2nd century AD. Well, that's not true, I have Low's abridgement of Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, but nobody reads that to learn history, they only read it for Gibbon's writting. Any recommendations? Specifically of European history, but quite broad (meaning if it covers world history it's fine) and comprehensive, but not encyclopaedic (do I sound picky?). There's the Cambridge Ancient History, but that spans over ten volumes! Any suggestions are much appreciated, thanks.

qspeechc
It's very difficult to find good sources of ancient history, especially those which are reliable in the sense that they are supported by archeological and historical evidence. There are translations of old historic texts, but one has to understand the context and bias of the author, as well as the influence of the translator.

Cambridge Ancient History is one of the best resources.

I'm particularly interested in Neothilic period through the Middle Ages.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
21K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K