What Are the Best Physics Logic Puzzles on Forces and Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nachore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around physics logic puzzles related to forces and energy, exploring concepts such as acceleration, air resistance, and the behavior of springs. Participants engage with various scenarios to analyze underlying principles in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to reason through the relationships between mass, weight, and acceleration in free fall, questioning the role of air resistance and the nature of forces in springs. There are also inquiries about the reasoning behind specific answers and the implications of different interpretations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing alternative viewpoints and questioning the original poster's answers. Some guidance is offered regarding the concepts of weight and inertia, and there is an exploration of how energy relates to the scenarios presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the correct answers to the puzzles and the definitions of key terms, indicating a need for further clarification on concepts such as inertia and energy in the context of the problems posed.

Nachore
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Physics "logic" puzzles1

1. The battery output voltage, the bottle volume, the clock time, and the measure of weight all have something in common. Are they represented by:
one number (I think this is the answer)
more than one number

2. Water is shooting out of the end of a pipe. The end of pipe is bent into a figure 6.
The water shoots out in a curved arc
The water shoots out in a straight line (I think this is the answer)

3. If you drop a boulder and a pebble at the same time, they will fall together with equal accelerations(neglecting air resistance). The principal reason the heavier boulder doesn't accelerate more than the pebble has to do with:
energy
weight
inertia
surface area (I think this is the answer)
none of these

4. Suppose that both an elephant and a feather fall from a high tree. Which encounters the greatest force of air resistance in falling to the ground:
elephant
feather (I think this is the answer)
both the same

5. A strong man is pulling the spring apart. Is there a force in the spring?
yes
no (I think this is the answer)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have 3 and 5 wrong.
I must admit though, that I'm not sure what the answer to three should be. It is true that, when you apply the classical laws of physics (in particular, F = m a = m g), the mass drops out of the equation. So I guess the answer would be: "it has to do with weight". The surface area is only important when considering air resistance.

In 5: as soon as a spring is not in equilibrium, it will exert a force opposite to the displacement from that equilibrium. Of course, if the spring is very light or your man is very strong, the person stretching the spring won't actually feel this force. But if your spring is very stiff, you will! Think about the springs in the suspension of a car: if they are compressed by a hump in the road, they exert an opposite force and you will definitely feel that!

Can you also give us your reasoning for the other answers? Because for example in 2), one might expect the other answer?
 
If you think about universal gravitation, the force between the boulder and the Earth is bigger than the force between the pebble and the earth. Just from this you'd expect that the boulder would accelerate faster, but at the same time, it needs a larger force to be accelerated the same amount as the pebble would. In short, I think their masses help it accelerate faster, but inertia at the same time wants to slow it down so that in the end, everything accelerates at the same speed, g.

I'm not sure about the difference between weight and inertia, but weight is the final result, not the cause. Unlike the idea of mass, energy, or inertia, weight depends on what the situation is (ex: in space, neither have weight but on earth, the boulder has more weight than the pebble), and I don't think the laws of physics should depend on where you are. It should be universal.
 
Anadyne, by that reasoning it might as well be "inertia" (i.e. mass), but one might also argue that the answer is "energy" since the final velocity can be calculated from the potential energy before falling, and also there the mass will cancel out.
That's why I was having doubts about the formulation of 3).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K