Calculating Resultant Force and Energy in Physics Homework Problems

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating resultant forces and energy in physics problems involving a rocket and a bungee jumper. The subject area includes dynamics and energy conservation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of forces acting on the rocket, questioning the meaning of the given weights and thrust. There is also exploration of how to calculate energy stored in the bungee rope, with references to gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants clarifying definitions and correcting initial misunderstandings. Some have provided insights into the calculations, while others are still grappling with the concepts and relationships between forces and energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between weight and thrust in the context of the rocket problem. There is also mention of homework etiquette regarding posting multiple problems in separate threads.

zeldaspurpose
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rocket of force 1000N is propelled upwards by a thrust of 1800N. The air resistance is 500N.

a) Work out the resultant force on the rocket.

A bungee jumper of mass 60kg jumps from a bridge tied to an elastic rope which becomes taut after he falls 10m. Consider the jumper when he has fallen another 10m and is traveling at 15 m/s.

A) Work out how much energy is stored in the rope. Take g= 10 m/s squared and ignore air resistance.

Homework Equations



E = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


1)a)
1000N+1800N - 500N = 2300N

2)a)
60*10*10 = 6000J
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zeldaspurpose said:
1000N+1800N - 500N = 2300N
It says "a rocket of 1000N". What do you think that means?

Edit: please use a separate thread per problem.
 
I meant force! And sorry, I'll do that next time.
 
zeldaspurpose said:
I meant force! And sorry, I'll do that next time.
No, surely the 1800N is the thrust. Isn't the 1000N the weight?
 
I checked the question in my book and yes, it is weight. I am really sorry.
 
zeldaspurpose said:
I checked the question in my book and yes, it is weight. I am really sorry.
So how does that change your equation?
 
The equation e= mgh is for the second question. The answer to the first question is 300N, but I am not understanding why.
 
zeldaspurpose said:
The equation e= mgh is for the second question. The answer to the first question is 300N, but I am not understanding why.
I mean this equation
zeldaspurpose said:
1)a)
1000N+1800N - 500N = 2300N
 
I looked into it and I understood now, thanks for the help.
 
  • #10
For the second one if I am not mistaken would one not have to use gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy to find the amount of energy that was transferred to the rope?
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
37
Views
4K