What are the equations for a massless particle's worldline?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter NeedsHelpBadly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Massless
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equations governing the worldlines of massless particles in the context of a Schwarzschild black hole. Participants explore methods for deriving these equations, particularly focusing on the integration of geodesic equations and the use of conserved quantities like specific energy and angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks equations for the worldline parameters of massless particles, specifically r(λ), θ(λ), φ(λ), and t(λ).
  • Another suggests using the Schwarzschild metric in the geodesic equations, noting that the resulting integrals may not be elementary.
  • Some participants mention the use of Christoffel symbols and express difficulty in integrating the resulting equations due to dependencies on other coordinate velocities.
  • A participant proposes a relation for radial velocity based on conservation of energy and momentum, indicating that the total energy and momentum remain constant.
  • Several participants discuss the advantages of leveraging the symmetries of the Schwarzschild solution, suggesting the use of first integrals to simplify the problem.
  • One participant points out that for massless particles, certain quantities like the norm of the velocity 4-vector are zero, leading to a specific equation for radial motion.
  • There are references to external threads and resources that may contain relevant information, although some participants express frustration over incomplete solutions.
  • Participants discuss numerical integration methods, emphasizing the iterative nature of solving differential equations and the importance of initial conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to derive the equations for massless particles' worldlines. There are multiple competing views on the methods to use, including the integration of geodesic equations versus leveraging conserved quantities.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity of integrating the equations due to dependencies on other variables, and there are mentions of unresolved mathematical steps in deriving the radial component of velocity.

NeedsHelpBadly
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I've been trying for a while to calculate the paths of massless particles around a Schwarzschild black hole, and basically I've failed, but I really need the answer for writing a simulator.

Knowing the initial conditions of the particles, I need to know the equations for:

r(\lambda)
\theta(\lambda)
\phi(\lambda)
t(\lambda)

or equations that I can integrate easily.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far to tackle this problem ?
Basically, the way to do it is to plug the Schwarzschild metric into the geodesic equations, and, given initial conditions, obtain parametrized curves from the differential equations. I should warn you though that the integrals you will be getting aren't exactly elementary.
 
Google for "schwarzschild equation of motion" will find these equations fairly quickly.
 
I've tried plugging the Christoffel symbols into the geodesic equation, but I just don't understand how to integrate the equations I get. They have terms which are velocities along other coordinate axes, and which depend on the function which I would find by integrating. A worked example, maybe of the radial velocity with respect to time would be helpful. Also, I've been told that I can use specific energy and specific angular momentum as conserved quantities, but I don't know how to use them.
 
Nugatory said:
Google for "schwarzschild equation of motion" will find these equations fairly quickly.

Could you actually give a link to the pages that contain them, because I can't see them.
 
maybe of the radial velocity with respect to time would be helpful.

You don't need the geodesic equations for this; total energy and momentum is conserved, so the radial velocity relation must be of the form

\displaystyle{\frac{\dot{r}}{2}-\frac{GM}{r}=const.}

The dot refers to differentiation with respect to proper time. The constant must be chosen so that it matches with your initial conditions. What this basically says is that the sum of kinetic and potential energy of the infalling body remains that same at all times.

Bear in mind though that this gives you radial velocity only; to get the full trajectory you need to consider the complete set of equations.

How's this for starters :

http://physicspages.com/tag/geodesic-equation/
 
Last edited:
If you're doing it in terms of Christoffel symbols, you're doing it the hard way. Take advantage of the symmetries of Schwarzschild, which imply the existence of several first integrals.

First of all, assume the orbit is in the equatorial plane, so θ is out of the picture. The three first integrals are:

L = r2(dφ/ds)
Γ = (1 - rs/r) (dt/ds)
F = (1 - rs/r)-1(dr/ds)2 + r2(dφ/ds)2 - (1 - rs/r)(dt/ds)2

where rs is the Schwarzwschild radius and s is an affine parameter along the curve. L represents angular momentum, Γ represents energy, and F represents the norm of the velocity 4-vector. These quantities are conserved (constant) for the orbit of any test particle, whether it be massless or not.

For a particle coming in from infinity, choose s such that s = t at r = ∞. Then Γ = 1. Also for a particle which is massless, F = 0. Putting it all together gives

(dr/ds)2 = 1 - (1 - rs/r)L2/r2

This is the only equation you have to solve.

It's convenient to let b be the perihelion distance, i.e. r = b where dr/ds = 0
This determines L:

L2 = b2/(1 - rs/b).
 
Last edited:
Bill_K said:
If you're doing it in terms of Christoffel symbols, you're doing it the hard way. Take advantage of the symmetries of Schwarzschild, which imply the existence of several first integrals.

Good point :)
 
  • #10
  • #11
NeedsHelpBadly said:
That's perfect for me, except they never finished finding the equation for the radial component of velocity.
:confused: See post #7 above.
 
  • #12
Bill_K said:
:confused: See post #7 above.

Yes, I saw that, but I still have no idea how to integrate that, as it contains terms with r.
 
  • #13
Well that IS the equation. If you're writing a simulator, I assume you're planning to do the integration numerically.
 
  • #14
Yes, but what do I put as the value of r, if the point of integrating the r component of velocity is to find r?
 
  • #15
There's many methods of integrating differential equations numerically. They all share the feature that you start with an assumed value at an initial point, then use the DE to calculate the value at the next point, and so on repeatedly.

For example here's a video that explains Euler's method, which is one of the simplest.
 
  • #16
NeedsHelpBadly said:
Yes, but what do I put as the value of r, if the point of integrating the r component of velocity is to find r?

I'm not sure what your question is. Conceptually, you have some function r(s), where s is an affine parameter, and you have a differential equation for r(s) that says:

dr/ds = f(r)

See Bill K's post for f(r)

A very low order numerical approach would be to say that given r(s), r(s+delta) = r(s)+ delta*f(r). This comes from the definition of the derivative:

dr/ds = f(r) = [r(s+delta) - r(s) ] / delta

You know r(s), you assume a value for delta, and you solve this to find r(s+delta)

This wouldn't be recommendable in practice, the error would be too large. You'd want to use a more sophisticated and faster converging algorithm in practice. I hesitate to recommend a particular numerical algorithm at this point for several reasons.

An analytical approach would be to say that ##\int \frac{dr}{f(r)} = \int ds = s##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
457
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K