What Are the Geometric Properties of Complex Ratios?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the geometric properties of complex ratios, specifically the expression \(\frac{z-a}{z-b}\) as explored in Dr. Tristan Needham's "Visual Complex Analysis." The user describes their attempts to understand the constant angle formed by the chords \(\overrightarrow{az}\) and \(\overrightarrow{bz}\) as point \(z\) moves along a circular arc defined by points \(a\) and \(b\). They conclude that the tangent of the angle can be expressed as \(\frac{Im((z-a)/(z-b))}{Re((z-a)/(z-b))}\) and reference the Euclidean geometry theorem regarding angles at the circumference standing on equal chords. The user seeks further clarification on their approach and potential diagrams to aid understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and functions
  • Familiarity with geometric properties of circles
  • Knowledge of Euclidean geometry theorems
  • Basic grasp of complex ratios and their arguments
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric interpretation of complex ratios in "Visual Complex Analysis" by Dr. Tristan Needham
  • Explore the properties of angles in circles, particularly the inscribed angle theorem
  • Learn about the argument of complex numbers and its geometric implications
  • Investigate the relationship between complex numbers and their geometric representations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the geometric interpretation of complex numbers and their properties.

JungleJesus
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I am reading Visual Complex Analysis by Dr. Tristan Needham and am hung up on some of the geometrical concepts. In particular, I am having trouble with ideas involving the geometric properties of numbers like:

\frac{z-a}{z-b}

Note: I am still in the first and second chapters, which deal with the basic geometry of complex numbers and functions.

As an example problem, here is one I've been trying to figure out for a few days:

attachment.php?attachmentid=37296&stc=1&d=1311039855.png


As an attempted solution, I chose three arbitrary points a, b, z and constructed the perpendicular bisector of a and b and a three point circle through a, b and z. The chord through a and b divides the circle into two regions.

Since z is a variable under a constraint, it may move freely about this circle. As long as z stays on the same side of chord \stackrel{\rightarrow}{ab}, the angle between the chords \stackrel{\rightarrow}{az} and \stackrel{\rightarrow}{bz} will be a constant. I interpreted (but have found no way to prove) the constant angle as the constant referred to in the problem.

That being said, it looked to me like the tangent of this angle was equal to Im((z-a)/(z-b))/Re((z-a)/(z-b)),
where Im(z) and Re(z) are the imaginary and real parts of the complex number z.

This is as far as I got. I showed that the angle between chords was constant along the three point circular arc of a, b and z. I have no idea if this is even the right place to look, and this problem is only one of many dealing with complex ratios that I simply don't understand.

Any help?
 

Attachments

  • VCA, Ch-1, Ex-11.png
    VCA, Ch-1, Ex-11.png
    11.8 KB · Views: 942
Physics news on Phys.org
The useful result from Euclidean Geometry is the following: Angles at the circumference standing on equal chords are equal.
 
Angles at the circumference standing on equal chords are equal.

I used this result earlier to move z along the arc to the perpendicular bisector of \stackrel{\rightarrow}{ab}, yielding an isosceles triangle inscribed in the three point circle. That didn't seem to help me. Is there a more useful approach?
 
Draw a new diagram. Also keep in mind the fact arg(p/q) = arg(p) - arg(q) . You should be able to see from the diagram why arg(z-a) - arg(z-b) is the angle <azb (on one side of the chord connecting ab at least). It then follows from the quoted theorem that the locus is the arc of a semi-circle.
 
Thanks a lot. This was a big help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K