What Are the Geometric Properties of Complex Ratios?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the geometric properties of complex ratios, specifically focusing on the expression \(\frac{z-a}{z-b}\) and its implications in the context of complex numbers and their geometric representations. Participants explore concepts from Euclidean geometry and their application to complex analysis, particularly in relation to angles and arcs defined by points in the complex plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty understanding the geometric properties of complex ratios and presents a specific problem involving points \(a\), \(b\), and \(z\).
  • Another participant cites a result from Euclidean geometry stating that angles at the circumference standing on equal chords are equal, suggesting its relevance to the problem.
  • A participant mentions using the aforementioned geometric result to analyze the movement of \(z\) along an arc, leading to an isosceles triangle inscribed in the circle, but finds it unhelpful.
  • Another reply introduces the concept that the argument of a quotient of complex numbers relates to the difference of their arguments, indicating that the angle \(\angle azb\) can be expressed in terms of the arguments of \(z-a\) and \(z-b\).
  • A participant concludes with appreciation for the clarification provided, indicating that the discussion has been helpful.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a definitive approach to the problem, and multiple viewpoints regarding the geometric interpretation of complex ratios and their properties are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the geometric configuration and the properties of angles in the context of complex numbers are not fully explored or resolved. The discussion relies on specific geometric theorems without detailed proofs or derivations.

JungleJesus
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I am reading Visual Complex Analysis by Dr. Tristan Needham and am hung up on some of the geometrical concepts. In particular, I am having trouble with ideas involving the geometric properties of numbers like:

\frac{z-a}{z-b}

Note: I am still in the first and second chapters, which deal with the basic geometry of complex numbers and functions.

As an example problem, here is one I've been trying to figure out for a few days:

attachment.php?attachmentid=37296&stc=1&d=1311039855.png


As an attempted solution, I chose three arbitrary points a, b, z and constructed the perpendicular bisector of a and b and a three point circle through a, b and z. The chord through a and b divides the circle into two regions.

Since z is a variable under a constraint, it may move freely about this circle. As long as z stays on the same side of chord \stackrel{\rightarrow}{ab}, the angle between the chords \stackrel{\rightarrow}{az} and \stackrel{\rightarrow}{bz} will be a constant. I interpreted (but have found no way to prove) the constant angle as the constant referred to in the problem.

That being said, it looked to me like the tangent of this angle was equal to Im((z-a)/(z-b))/Re((z-a)/(z-b)),
where Im(z) and Re(z) are the imaginary and real parts of the complex number z.

This is as far as I got. I showed that the angle between chords was constant along the three point circular arc of a, b and z. I have no idea if this is even the right place to look, and this problem is only one of many dealing with complex ratios that I simply don't understand.

Any help?
 

Attachments

  • VCA, Ch-1, Ex-11.png
    VCA, Ch-1, Ex-11.png
    11.8 KB · Views: 948
Physics news on Phys.org
The useful result from Euclidean Geometry is the following: Angles at the circumference standing on equal chords are equal.
 
Angles at the circumference standing on equal chords are equal.

I used this result earlier to move z along the arc to the perpendicular bisector of \stackrel{\rightarrow}{ab}, yielding an isosceles triangle inscribed in the three point circle. That didn't seem to help me. Is there a more useful approach?
 
Draw a new diagram. Also keep in mind the fact arg(p/q) = arg(p) - arg(q) . You should be able to see from the diagram why arg(z-a) - arg(z-b) is the angle <azb (on one side of the chord connecting ab at least). It then follows from the quoted theorem that the locus is the arc of a semi-circle.
 
Thanks a lot. This was a big help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K