What are the main heat sources for Earth's equilibrium surface temperature?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the various heat sources contributing to Earth's equilibrium surface temperature, including internal fission, gravitational tidal forces, and solar radiation. Participants explore the implications of these sources on the Earth's thermal state, both at the surface and below the crust.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that Earth's equilibrium surface temperature is primarily influenced by solar radiation combined with atmospheric effects.
  • One participant suggests that internal radioactive decay, rather than fission, played a significant role in remelting the Earth's core approximately 0.5 billion years after its formation.
  • Another participant notes that tidal heating of the core is negligible compared to other heat sources.
  • Concerns are raised about the efficiency of radiative transfer from the core to the surface, with one participant emphasizing the insulating properties of the Earth's crust.
  • There is a discussion about the solidification of the Earth, with some participants questioning how it is known that the core was solid and whether it ever fully solidified.
  • One participant mentions that the original materials forming the Earth were solid and discusses the melting process due to gravitational pressure during its formation.
  • Another participant references the mainstream theory regarding the Moon's formation, suggesting that a significant impact contributed to the melting of the Earth's surface.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the processes involved in the Earth's thermal history, particularly regarding the solidification of the core and the contributions of various heat sources. There is no consensus on these points, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the cooling rates, the total radiation from decay products, and the implications of the oldest rock dates. These factors contribute to the uncertainty surrounding the thermal history of the Earth.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
What would Earth's equilibrium surface temperature range be from

1. Internal fission alone

2. Gravitational tidal forces alone

3. Solar radiation alone
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I suspect current surface temperature is basically a result of solar radiation combined with atmospheric effects. But below the surface crust, why hasn't the Earth solidified yet?
 
The surface temperature is pretty much in equilibrium with solar radiation.
The core was remelted about 0.5Gyr after the Earth formed due to internal radioactive decay ( not fission ).
There is some tidal heating of the core but it is negligible.
It hasn't solidified because there is quite a lot of it, the crust is not a good conductor and the surface+atmosphere are at 300K.
 
Remelted? How do we know it was solid?
 
Radiative transfer from the core to the surface of the Earth is extremely inefficient. The Earth's crust is a superb insulator.
 
cesiumfrog said:
Remelted? How do we know it was solid?

The original gas, dust and small rocks that formed the Earth were solid. They were small and exposed to the cold of space. They would have melted and flowed under gravitational pressure as the Earth grew that's why the Earth is spherical while asteroids and small moons are more 'lumpy'.
I'm not sure that the Earth necessarily cooled into a complete solid before the heat input from radiation melted it again. Certainly the mantle and crust were 're'-melted but it might be that the core never solidified - sorry not quite my field.

The dates come from a combinatiopn of cooling rates, estimates of the total amount of radiation from level sof decay products and the dates of the oldest rocks found.
 
the remelt was just a bit of the surface. What's more, I subscribe to the mainstream notion that the moon was formed when a Mars sized planetoid came smashing into the earth. That was enough kinetic energy to turn the place into a major molton disaster.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
14K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
9K