What Are the Most Probable Angles for a Rigid Rotor in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TI-83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Rotor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the most probable angles (theta, phi) for a rigid rotor in quantum mechanics, specifically for the spherical harmonic with quantum numbers m=1 and l=1.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the angles by manipulating the spherical harmonic equation and exploring the probability density derived from it. Some participants question the approach of setting the product of the wavefunction and its conjugate equal to 1, suggesting instead to focus on maximizing the probability density.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the relationship between theta and phi in the context of probability density, with some guidance provided regarding the symmetry of the problem and the independence of phi in the probability density function.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the interpretation of the wavefunction and the implications of symmetry in the angular distribution of the rigid rotor.

TI-83
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to find the angles (theta, phi) it is most probable to find the rigid rotor for the spherical harmonic m=1, l=1


Homework Equations



The equation given is Y = (3/8pi)1/2*sin(theta)*ei*phi

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to solve it by multiplying by the complex conjugate and setting that equal to 1. Doing so, I obtain (3/8pi)*sin2(theta) = 1 ... but from there, I can't seem to figure out how to solve for the angles (theta, phi). Any suggestions of where to go from here? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're misunderstanding what Y is. Y is the angular component of the wavefunction. The product of Y with its complex conjugate gives the probability density of finding the rotor at (theta,phi). Setting this product to 1 is meaningless; instead, you want to see at which angles this probability density is highest.
 
I see what you're saying.

So if I set Y = (Y)(Y*), I get that Y = (3/8pi)(sin2theta)

Therefore, I know at theta = pi/2, Y will be greatest. What is the impact of phi on this, though? Or am I just not getting it (again)?
 
phi cancels out, so the probability density does not depend on phi. This makes sense--the configuration is symmetrical about the z axis, so it wouldn't be logical for one "phi" to be favored over another.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K