Schrodinger equation in three dimensions. Atom with one electron.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Schrödinger equation for a one-electron atom in spherical coordinates, specifically addressing the wave function representation as $$\Psi = \Theta(\theta)\phi(\varphi)R(r)$$. The chosen solution $$\phi = e^{im\rho}$$ is justified over alternatives like $$e^{-im\rho}$$, $$sin(m\rho)$$, and $$cos(m\rho)$$ due to its simplicity and relevance in representing angular momentum. The other functions, while mathematically valid, do not provide additional benefits in this context, particularly noting that $$cos(m\rho)$$ is not an eigenfunction of the azimuthal angular momentum operator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation and quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates in physics
  • Knowledge of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Basic proficiency in complex exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the properties of eigenfunctions and their significance in quantum systems
  • Investigate the role of separation of variables in solving partial differential equations
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of spherical harmonics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, as well as educators seeking to deepen their understanding of the Schrödinger equation and its applications in atomic systems.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
All below
Relevant Equations
Schrodinger equation in spherical coordinates.
When solving the Schrödinger equation by separation of variables to atom with one electron and in the spherical coordinates, we get $$\Psi = \Theta(\theta)\phi(\varphi)R(r)$$
Specifically, $$\phi = e^{im\rho }$$
The question is, why we adopt this particular solution, in general, we have this options too:
$$\phi = e^{-im\rho } ; sin(m\rho) ; cos(m\rho)$$
I am trying to see what is the problem with the other.
All are univoc, continuous... (actually, we can make it be continuous is better to say!)
Actually, i would say this:
$$cos(m\rho)$$ changes nothing, but is boring deal with.
$$e^{-im\rho }$$ is like to measure the angle clockwise, unnecessary.
$$sin(m\rho)$$ ... nothing too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, i think i get it already. The particular adopted already contain the other when we use the module on m... Just ignore this topic
 
##cos(m \rho)## isn't an eigenfunction of the azimuthal angular momentum operator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K