What Are the Potential Downsides of Perennial Grain Crops Like Kernza®?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the potential of perennial crops, specifically Kernza® Grain, as a sustainable agricultural option. While Kernza offers benefits such as reduced tillage frequency—only requiring tillage every three years compared to conventional crops—concerns about its productivity and market viability persist. Critics highlight that more research is needed to enhance its yields, and there are doubts about its ability to compete with established crops in conventional markets. However, proponents suggest that Kernza could thrive in less favorable soil conditions or in regions with limited machinery, indicating its potential for niche applications. The overarching sentiment is that the free market will ultimately determine the success of perennial crops based on production costs and yield comparisons.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,399
Reaction score
7,253
Agriculture and Agronomy is where Plant Biology meets Earth Science.

I listened to an interview about perennial crops, particularly, Kernza® Grain, which I know nothing about. It sounds so good, I wondered about the downside.

https://landinstitute.org/our-work/perennial-crops/

https://landinstitute.org/our-work/perennial-crops/kernza/

Critical article - Perennial Wheat Is Not Going to Save Us — Not Yet, at Least
https://ambrook.com/research/crops/kernza-salish-blue-perennial-wheat

More research is needed to improve productivity.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Rive and berkeman
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
As with most things, the free market will sort it out. The folks that produce the products know what goes into it. If the cost to produce the perennial is enough less to offset the poorer bushels produced compared to conventional wheat then it might fly. I noticed one link mentioned it produced for about three years. This means tillage only every three years. It also implies that conventional crops are tilled every year which is not necessarily true.
 
Averagesupernova said:
the free market will sort it out.
I think this will kind of go around the 'market'. In conventional production it's very hard to compete with the 'old crops'. But on soil not good enough or in an environment with less machinery available these can still thrive.
But that's not really 'market'.

I would say it's an interesting and important idea for some small, specific niches.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 65 ·
2
Replies
65
Views
11K