What Are the Reactions at the Occipital Condyles in a Head Impact Analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mpm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biomechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around analyzing the reactions at the occipital condyles during a head impact scenario, specifically after a blow to the chin. The user is uncertain about how to incorporate moment of inertia into their calculations, particularly when neglecting torque. They have used the parallel axis theorem to determine the necessary inertia and are considering summing moments about the condyle to find a reaction force. A suggestion is made to include an image for clarity, as it may aid in providing more accurate assistance. The user estimates a reaction force of about 9500 N and seeks validation on its feasibility.
mpm
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
I have a Force Acceleration analysis that I am un sure of. I have a picture of a skull that is punched/kicked/whatever in the chin.

Problem Statement:

The head shown in the figure below is considered a rigid body. IT rocks on the occipital condyle, C, where an axial force, Fa, and a shear force, V, and a neck torque, To, resist the motion. A blow is applied to the chin at point B at an angle of 63 degrees relative to the horizontal. The initial linear acceleration, a, of the mass center, G, is photographically deteremined to be 140 x gravity. For a head of mass 3.5kg, a moment of inertia of 0.0356 kgm^2 about an axis perpendicular to the sagittal plane is calculate.d WHat are the reactions at the occipital condyles if torque To is neglected?


Ive used the parallel axis theorem to find my actual needed inertia.

I am thinking that maybe I need to do a sum of moments about the condyle to find a reaction force, but I'm not sure if that is right or how to do it. I can't figure out how to incoroporate the moment of inertia.

If anyone can help shed some light for me, I would appreciate it.

I will also be around to answer any questions one might have.

Thanks a bunch.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After doing some research, I have come to the conclusion that if i neglect torque, then I don't even need to worry about moment of inertia. Is this correct? I can't find any equation that relates linear motion with moment of inertia unless there is torque involved.

Is this correct?
 
You may want to put an image on the web, since I don't see any included in your post. Until then, no one will probably be able to help you. :smile:
 
Here is an attachment of what my assignment is.
 

Attachments

  • example.GIF
    example.GIF
    87.7 KB · Views: 655
Last edited:
The answer I came up with is about 9500 N. Is this possible?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top