What are the risk factors for heart disease in women?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the risk factors for heart disease in women, exploring both the perception of heart disease as a predominantly male issue and the increasing awareness of its impact on women. Participants discuss various risk factors, societal influences, and personal experiences related to heart disease.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Personal experience

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that heart disease has historically been viewed as a men's disease, despite statistics showing that more women die from it each year.
  • There is a mention of increasing risk factors for heart disease in younger women, including diabetes, obesity, and stress, along with a list of specific risk factors such as family history and past pregnancy complications.
  • One participant discusses the role of NHS General Practitioners as gatekeepers, suggesting that this has contributed to a misunderstanding of heart disease prevalence among women.
  • Another participant questions the validity of certain risk factors, particularly "low physical activity," suggesting that modern conveniences may have altered the landscape of physical activity and health reporting.
  • A personal account is shared regarding genetic heart disease, highlighting the emotional and medical complexities faced by individuals with a family history of heart disease.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the perception and reporting of heart disease in women, with some agreeing on the importance of recognizing it as a significant health threat while others challenge the framing of risk factors and the influence of societal structures. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the understanding of heart disease risk factors, including potential biases in medical reporting and the influence of societal norms on diagnosis and treatment.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,584
Reaction score
7,541
Apparently it has been thought that heart disease is mostly a men's disease.

But - Since 1984, more women than men have died each year from heart disease. Heart disease is now the No. 1 killer of women, causing more deaths than all cancers combined! And yet only 56 percent of American women realize that heart disease is their greatest health threat!

The risk of heart disease is increasing in younger women (ages 29-45)! Often the first symptom of heart disease is 'sudden death'! Well, then it's too late.

http://news.yahoo.com/katie-couric-barbra-streisand-heart-disease-awareness-for-women-205528626.html

Risk factors for heart disease are increasing, particularly diabetes, obesity and stress. Additional risk factors women should be aware of include:
• Family history
• High blood pressure
• Diet
• High cholesterol
• Low physical activity
• Smoking
• Past complications in pregnancy:
◦ High blood pressure
◦ Diabetes
◦ Preeclampsia
◦ Eclampsia
• Auto-immune disorders, such as:
◦ Rheumatoid arthritis
◦ Lupus
• Menopause before age 45
• Migraines with aura
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Astronuc said:
Apparently it has been thought that heart disease is mostly a men's disease.

NHS General-Practitioners are gatekeepers who filter which patients get to see a consultant. 40 years ago women with angina didn't get sent to the cardiologist because they weren't as economically-active as today , whereas if their their tax-paying husband had angina he would be sent so he could be kept alive and well and in-work and paying taxes.

So the NHS cardiologists got the false impression heart-disease was predominantly male, because of the NHS GP filtering process designed to minimize the cost of illness to the state , ( which is the function of the NHS ).
 
Last edited:
B0b-A said:
NHS GPs are gatekeepers (snip)...

Perhaps within some countries/societies, but generally? "Low physical activity" is the most suspicious item on the list given all the labor saving devices (washing machines, dish washers, vacuums) that have eliminated the aerobic drudgery of the 19th and first half of 20th centuries.

On the other hand, "thar's gold in them thar diagnoses" and the pharmaceuticals prescribed to "treat/control" risk factors, plus kudos for over-diagnosing (leads to opportunities to brag about medical advances; we save 97% of people at risk today compared to only one patient out of ten a hundred years ago). Padding statistics with "straw men," so to speak. Heart disease has move into first place as much due to a difference in measurement, reporting, and diagnostics as to general health. Pick your position, and be prepared to abandon it because there ain't no good measurements or statistics to back up any position you choose.
 
I have just recently been diagnosed with genetic heart disease, my family has a long history of it. I'm actually glad, we die quickly and don't have any cancer or other debilitating long term diseases. It also means I could pass any time pretty much without warning. Unfortunately I have severe adverse reactions to medicines they've prescribed. I'd rather go quickly. My cardiologist and his staff are wonderful people.

http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/heart_vascular_institute/clinical_services/specialty_areas/center_inherited_heart_diseases.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K