What are the steps for calculating the center of mass of this object?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the center of mass (COM) of an object, one must consider the symmetry of the object, which simplifies the process for certain axes, such as the Y-axis in this case. The discussion highlights that for a sphere with a spherical hole, the gravitational attraction can be analyzed without directly calculating the COM by using superposition principles. Instead of finding the COM, it is suggested to compare the gravitational forces of a solid sphere and a sphere with a hollow section, emphasizing that the forces can be derived from their respective masses. The conversation also reminds participants of forum rules regarding providing complete solutions to homework problems. Understanding the gravitational attraction requires more than just the mass and distance from the COM, especially for non-uniform objects.
Pochen Liu
Messages
52
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Centre of mass of a sphere with a spherical hole
Relevant Equations
N/A
What are the steps to calculating the center of mass for this object? I don't want a numerical answer just the theory.

I understand I need to calculate COM for all axis, we know in the Y axis it's dead centre because of symmetry but I don't know how to do it for the others.

A hint would be most helpful :)

243664
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pochen Liu said:
Problem Statement: Centre of mass of a sphere with a spherical hole
Relevant Equations: N/A

What are the steps to calculating the center of mass for this object? I don't want a numerical answer just the theory.

I understand I need to calculate COM for all axis, we know in the Y axis it's dead centre because of symmetry but I don't know how to do it for the others.

A hint would be most helpful :)

View attachment 243664
I don't think you actually need to find the COM to solve this problem.

What would the gravitational attraction be if the larger sphere (R = 4 cm) was completely solid, and had no hollow part?

What would the gravitational attraction be if instead of the hollow part there was a solid lead sphere (R = 2 cm) in the location where the hollow part would be, and the larger sphere (R = 4cm) didn't exist? (In other words, there's only a single R = 2 cm sphere, made of solid lead, in the location where the location where the hollowed out part would have been.) [Edit: well, I mean of course the small m = 0.431 kg sphere shown in yellow is still there. I just mean that the bulk of the larger, R = 2 cm sphere doesn't exist, and is instead replaced by a lead sphere where the hollow part would have been.]

What's the difference between these two forces? 😉
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Pochen Liu
collinsmark said:
I don't think you actually need to find the COM to solve this problem.

What would the gravitational attraction be if the larger sphere (R = 4 cm) was completely solid, and had no hollow part?

What would the gravitational attraction be if instead of the hollow part there was a solid lead sphere (R = 2 cm) in the location where the hollow part would be, and the larger sphere (R = 4cm) didn't exist? (In other words, there's only a single R = 2 cm sphere, made of solid lead, in the location where the location where the hollowed out part would have been.) [Edit: well, I mean of course the small m = 0.431 kg sphere shown in yellow is still there. I just mean that the bulk of the larger, R = 2 cm sphere doesn't exist, and is instead replaced by a lead sphere where the hollow part would have been.]

What's the difference between these two forces? 😉
I see, so how would you put this formally?

I understand that it's the force of gravity from its mass, but why does this work?
 
It's basically just superposition.

Sphere with hollow section + mass where hollow section would be = solid sphere

Similarly,

Force from sphere with hollow section + force from mass where hollow section would be
= force from solid sphere.

Applying algebra,

Force from sphere with hollow section
= force from solid sphere - force from mass where hollow section would be
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS and Pochen Liu
243740
243741
243742
243743
243744
 
243745
 
If you have any question, please let me know.
 
Hello @Samanko,

Welcome to Pysics Forums!

Please note for the future that it is against Forum rules to post complete or near-complete solutions to homework problems before the Original Poster has arrived at a correct solution to the problem and any related questions they have by their own efforts. Helpers can only provide guidance via hints and suggestions or pointing out errors in the OP's attempts.

Check out the pinned thread, https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/guidelines-for-students-and-helpers.686781/
 
  • Like
Likes Samanko
gneill said:
Hello @Samanko,

Welcome to Pysics Forums!

Please note for the future that it is against Forum rules to post complete or near-complete solutions to homework problems before the Original Poster has arrived at a correct solution to the problem and any related questions they have by their own efforts. Helpers can only provide guidance via hints and suggestions or pointing out errors in the OP's attempts.

Check out the pinned thread, https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/guidelines-for-students-and-helpers.686781/
Yes
I'll be careful in the future.
 
  • Like
Likes gneill
  • #10
collinsmark said:
I don't think you actually need to find the COM to solve this problem.
.. and it wouldn’t help anyway.
@Pochen Liu , you cannot in general find the gravitational attraction to an object at a point merely by knowing its mass and the distance from the point to its mass centre. That only works for spheres that are either uniformly dense or consist of concentric uniform shells; and the point must be outside.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
Back
Top