What are the steps to solve a work problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a work problem in physics, specifically calculating the average power output for a person running up an inclined hillside. The problem involves concepts of work, energy, and power, with a focus on understanding the relevant physical principles and units involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the importance of identifying what the question is asking, filtering relevant information, and understanding the relationship between work and energy. There are mentions of different approaches to calculating work, including using potential energy and kinetic energy, as well as the significance of unit conversions.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of the problem and discussing the steps involved in approaching it. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relevance of certain physical concepts and the need to focus on specific aspects of the problem, such as vertical distance and energy changes.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that participants are grappling with the conceptual understanding of work and energy, particularly in the context of internal versus external forces. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the problem setup and the necessary steps to approach it.

LexRunner
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I know there isn't a "set in stone" step by step procedure to solve work problems, but if someone could give me a basic procedure it would be greatly appreaciated. When ever I read a work problem, unless it is a simple "plug in the value" works equation problem, I do not understand how to start off the problem. Maybe its just that I don't understand the concept?
For example, can you make a procedure that fits this problem:
"Calculate the average power output necessary for a 55.8 kg person to run up a 12.0 m long hillside, which is inclined at 25.0° above the horizontal, in 3.00 s. Express your answer in horsepower."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Determine what the question is asking for. In this case it's obvious: The question is asking for "average power".
  • Know your units. In this case, power is energy per unit time.
  • Filter out the irrelevant information. In this case, the person is running up a hill. From a biomechanical perspective, it takes a good deal of energy to run on flat ground for 26 miles. From a physics perspective, how humans run is irrelevant.
  • Determine what is relevant. In this case, it's vertical distance.
  • There are some things you just have to know. In this case, it's the relation between change in altitude and energy.
  • Watch out for tricks. In this case, you're not quite finished when you get an answer in joules. You need to convert to horsepower.
  • Answer the question!
 
This is one area of physics that I think gets easier when you get to more advanced levels, where such a procedure exists.

But for basic physics I would say to try this. Just quickly ask yourself what is doing the work, and what is it doing the work on. Then just quickly think about W=F*d to predict the sign of the work.
Then to actually find the value you can either use W=F*d or W=-ΔU where U is potential energy. (in case you don't know ΔU = Ufinal - Uinitial)

I saw the other thread you made in which you were asking about when to use PE or KE (which I'll label U and T). Notice I didn't write an equation involving T (kinetic energy) above, because the cases in which you substitute T for work come from W=-ΔU too. Usually this is because the problem will be a situation in which ΔU=-ΔT.
So then you can see that if W=-ΔU then for that specific problem work must also be W=ΔT and you can pick whichever one is easier to solve.

However, in this problem you do not have a free-body moving under the influence of only external forces (because the human is generating internal forces to run) so ΔU is not equal to -ΔT and therefore you cannot use kinetic energy to solve this problem, and you use potential energy U instead.

Also, if you are getting hung up on signs, just be aware that a lot of teachers and even textbooks get lazy with their signs for work and sometimes get the signs wrong. Just a warning so you don't waste too much time troubling over work signs like I remember doing.
 
Related to:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...in-kinetic-energy-or-potential-energy.777302/
Maybe its just that I don't understand the concept?
... it is important to understand what you are being asked for, yes.
Perhaps you should work through some examples, showing us how you are thinking about each problem?

spl-083902 said:
However, in this problem you do not have a free-body moving under the influence of only external forces (because the human is generating internal forces to run) so ΔU is not equal to -ΔT and therefore you cannot use kinetic energy to solve this problem, and you use potential energy U instead.
... actually, if a change in speed were given, then the runner would have to generate the power, internally, for that too; and you may have to use KE for the calculation as well. They key is that the total change in energy is zero.

Sometimes the question has to be read carefully:
In the example, the question does not care about the work to change speed, or pant or keep running or anything else, - only the work to get to the top of the hill.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K