I What can be deduced about the roots of this polynomial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dowland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials Roots
Dowland
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I'm currently doing some research about feedback systems in engineering and right now I'm playing around with special types of feedback matrices. In the process, I stumbled upon a potentially interesting polynomial, which is actually the characteristic polynomial of the system. It looks as follows:

$$\begin{align*} P(z) &= z^{m_1+m_2+m_3+m_4}
- z^{m_2+m_3+m_4} + z^{m_1+m_3+m_4} + z^{m_1+m_2+m_4} - z^{m_1+m_2+m_3} \\
&\quad - z^{m_3+m_4} - z^{m_2+m_4} - z^{m_1+m_3} - z^{m_1+m_2}
- z^{m_4} + z^{m_3} + z^{m_2} - z^{m_1} + 2\end{align*}$$

Where the m_i's are positive integers. Since my background in algebra is a little weak, I'm basically curious if anyone with more insight can see something interesting about this polynomial? Maybe someone could even give a hint about some theorem or similar that could be helpful? I would like to be able to say something about its roots over the complex numbers but so far I have not find any useful theorem in my basic abstract algebra textbook. It almost looks symmetric, except for the annoying switching of signs in front of the different terms, and unfortunately, it's not skew-symmetric either. The only thing I can say is that I've been trying different values for the m_i's in Matlab (like more or less random positive integers) and all the roots always end up on the unit circle, which is one of the reasons I think the issue is interesting.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not my field, but ##x_k=z^{m_k}## might work better.
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak
Hi. I observe:

P(1)=1 so P(1)-1 has factor (z-1).

P(z)-2 has factor z^n where n=min{m1,m2,m3,m4}.

m1 and m4 are exchangeable. m2 and m3 are exchangeable. To show it explicitly
P(z)=abcd+ad(b+c)-bc(a+d)-(a+d-1)(b+c+1)+3
=(1-a)(1-d)(1+b)(1+c)+3-ad-bc
=(1-a)(1-d)(1+b)(1+c)-(1-a)(1-d)-(1+b)(1+c)+(1-a)+(1-d)+(1+b)+(1+c)+1
=[1-(1-a)(1-d)][1-(1+b)(1+c)]+(1-a)+(1-d)+(1+b)+(1+c)
where ##a=z^{m_1}## and so on. This shows (a and -b) and (d and -c) are exchangeable and so on.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes Keith_McClary
I find your question interesting; and especially, your empirical observation that all the roots are on the unit circle. I have not tried to think about your question. I wrote to you because of your question itself, and about your other post about G Chrystal's Textbook of Algebra. I have been browsing the book for a while now. I am looking for a mathematics friend with whom I can discuss it.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K