What is the acceleration of the masses in a double double Atwood machine?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The acceleration of the masses in a double double Atwood machine with masses arranged as m, 4m, 2m, and m has been calculated using Lagrange's equation of motion. The resulting accelerations are am1 = 5/11g, am2 = -7/11g, am3 = -3/11g, and am4 = 5/11g. The confusion arises when comparing the acceleration of mass m3 (am3 = g/11) to that of a single Atwood machine with equivalent masses, which yields a different acceleration (g/4). The key takeaway is that the motion of the two additional Atwood machines affects the overall dynamics, preventing a simple summation of masses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Lagrange's equation of motion
  • Understanding of double Atwood machines
  • Basic principles of classical mechanics
  • Knowledge of acceleration and tension in pulley systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lagrangian mechanics in detail
  • Explore the dynamics of multi-mass pulley systems
  • Learn about tension calculations in Atwood machines
  • Investigate the effects of mass distribution on acceleration in complex systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, engineers working with pulley systems, and anyone interested in advanced dynamics involving multiple masses and accelerations.

Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47

Homework Statement


This is actually a problem I solved but I'm having trouble reconcile the answer with my intuition
(Check the end of the post for my actual question).

The problem:
Find the acceleration of the masses for the double double Atwood machine (see figure)
The masses are from left to right ##m, 4m , 2m, m##.

Homework Equations


Lagrange's equation of motion
##\frac{d}{d t} \frac{\partial L }{\partial \dot q^i} -\frac{\partial L}{\partial q^i} = 0##.

The Attempt at a Solution


Here's the short version of my solution:
##m_1: \; \; T =\frac{m}{2}(\dot x- \dot z)^2, \; \; V = mg(x-z)##
##m_2:\; \; T = 2m(\dot x+ \dot z)^2, \; \; V = -4mg(x+z)##
##m_3: \; \; T =m(\dot z- \dot y)^2, \; \; V = 2mg(z-y)##
##m_4: \; \; T = \frac{m}{2}(\dot y+ \dot z)^2, \; \; V = mg(y+z)##
Inputting this into L.E. we end up with an equation system
##\begin{bmatrix}5 &0 & 3\\ 0 & 3 & -1 \\ 3 & -1 & 8\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}\ddot x\\\ddot y\\ \ddot z\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}3g\\g\\2g\end{bmatrix}##
This gives ##\ddot x = 6/11g##, ##\ddot y = 4/11g##, ##\ddot z =1/11g##. Which gives the acceleration of ##a_{m_1} = 5/11g, a_{m_2} = -7/11g, a_{m_3} = -3/11g, a_{m_4} = 5/11g##. This is the correct answer according to the book.

My question is about why ##\ddot z = g/11##. Why isn't this the same acceleration as that of a single Atwood machine with masses of ##1m+4m=5m## and ##2m+1m = 3m## i.e. ##a=g\frac{5-3}{5+3} = g/4##. I can't see how the motion of the two other Atwood machine should change anything. When drawing a free body diagram I still see these forces but this doesn't agree with my other solution.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Incand said:

Homework Statement


This is actually a problem I solved but I'm having trouble reconcile the answer with my intuition
(Check the end of the post for my actual question).

The problem:
Find the acceleration of the masses for the double double Atwood machine (see figure)
The masses are from left to right ##m, 4m , 2m, m##.

Homework Equations


Lagrange's equation of motion
##\frac{d}{d t} \frac{\partial L }{\partial \dot q^i} -\frac{\partial L}{\partial q^i} = 0##.

The Attempt at a Solution


Here's the short version of my solution:
##m_1: \; \; T =\frac{m}{2}(\dot x- \dot z)^2, \; \; V = mg(x-z)##
##m_2:\; \; T = 2m(\dot x+ \dot z)^2, \; \; V = -4mg(x+z)##
##m_3: \; \; T =m(\dot z- \dot y)^2, \; \; V = 2mg(z-y)##
##m_4: \; \; T = \frac{m}{2}(\dot y+ \dot z)^2, \; \; V = mg(y+z)##
Inputting this into L.E. we end up with an equation system
##\begin{bmatrix}5 &0 & 3\\ 0 & 3 & -1 \\ 3 & -1 & 8\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}\ddot x\\\ddot y\\ \ddot z\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}3g\\g\\2g\end{bmatrix}##
This gives ##\ddot x = 6/11g##, ##\ddot y = 4/11g##, ##\ddot z =1/11g##. Which gives the acceleration of ##a_{m_1} = 5/11g, a_{m_2} = -7/11g, a_{m_3} = -3/11g, a_{m_4} = 5/11g##. This is the correct answer according to the book.

My question is about why ##\ddot z = g/11##. Why isn't this the same acceleration as that of a single Atwood machine with masses of ##1m+4m=5m## and ##2m+1m = 3m## i.e. ##a=g\frac{5-3}{5+3} = g/4##. I can't see how the motion of the two other Atwood machine should change anything. When drawing a free body diagram I still see these forces but this doesn't agree with my other solution.
You are thinking of the lower Atwood machines as single masses, which we cannot do.

Let's go back to a simple Atwood machine as an example. Let's say you ask someone to calculate the tension of a string holding the pulley and someone says: obviously, this will simply be (m1+m2)g since there are two masses m1 and m2 hanging from the whole setup. In other words, that person considers the whole Atwood machine as a single mass. But that does not give the correct tension in the string attached to the pulley, right? (unless the two masses are equal, in which case the answer is indeed 2 mg). The reason is the setup contains parts that are accelerating (and have different accelerations). The same explanation applies here, to your double Atwood machine.

Hope this helps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Thanks, that was a really good explanation! And it gave me some practice trying the single Atwood machine example.

Doing some calculations for a single Atwood machine I found that if the tension in the string is ##T## then the acceleration of each mass must be ##T/m_1-g = g-T/m_2##. It follows that ##T=\frac{2m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}g##.
The force on the string must then be double this so ##F_1 = 16mg/5## and ##F_2 = 8mg/3## (Using the masses in the original exercise).
But had the Atwood machines instead been point masses they must have had the masses of ##m_L = 16/5m## and ##m_R = 8/3m## and then ##\ddot z = g(16/5-8/3)/(16/5+8/3) = \frac{(8/15)}{(88/15)}g = g/11##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K