What Can Be Said About the Eigenvalues of B^{-1}A Given A and B?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the generalized eigenvalue problem defined by Av = λBv, where A is a positive semidefinite matrix and B is a diagonal matrix with positive entries. It is established that the generalized eigenvalues are nonnegative, and a conservative bound is proposed: λmin(B^{-1}A) ≥ λmin(A)/Bmax. The Rayleigh quotient is also examined, indicating that increasing the diagonal entries of B reduces vibration frequencies when A represents a stiffness matrix and B a mass matrix. Further exploration of perturbation theory is suggested for deeper insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of generalized eigenvalue problems
  • Knowledge of positive semidefinite matrices
  • Familiarity with Rayleigh quotients
  • Basic concepts of perturbation theory in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of positive semidefinite matrices
  • Learn about generalized eigenvalue problems in linear algebra
  • Explore the Rayleigh quotient and its applications
  • Investigate perturbation theory and its implications for eigenvalues
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and researchers working with linear algebra, particularly those focused on eigenvalue problems, vibration analysis, and matrix perturbation theory.

JohnSimpson
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Consider a generalized Eigenvalue problem Av = \lambda Bv
where $A$ and $B$ are square matrices of the same dimension. It is known that $A$ is positive semidefinite, and that $B$ is diagonal with positive entries.

It is clear that the generalized eigenvalues will be nonnegative. What else can one say about the eigenvalues of the generalized problem in terms of the eigenvalues of $A$ and the diagonals of $B$? Equivalently, what else can one say about the eigenvalues of B^{-1}A?

It seems reasonable (skipping over zero eigenvalues) that

<br /> \lambda_{min}(B^{-1}A) \geq \lambda_{min}(A)/B_{max}<br />

but I am unable to see how one could rigorously show this, and it is perhaps a conservative bound. Equivalently again, what could one say about the eigenvalues of
<br /> B^{-1/2}AB^{-1/2}<br />

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For any vector ##x##, the Rayleigh quotient ##x^T A x / x^T B x \ge x^T A x / x^T B_{max} x##.

And ## \lambda_{min} = \min_x x^T A x / x^T B x##.

Physically it is "obvious" if A is a stiffness matrix and B is a mass matrix. Increasing the mass (by making all the diagonal entries of B equal to the biggest) must reduce the vibration freqencies.

Another way to attack this would be to treat it as a perturbation of the original problem, i.e. let ##B_{max} = B + D##. IIRC there is some nice theory about this, but I'm not energetic enough to start looking it up right now.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K