What Causes Peaks in Reflectance Graph of Polished Silicon Wafer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hjelmgart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Reflectance
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the peaks observed in the reflectance graph of polished silicon wafers, with participants exploring their causes. One theory suggests that the peaks may relate to the band gap of silicon, which is 1.1 eV, and the potential for additional energy paths for conduction. Another idea posits a connection to the imaginary part of the refractive index, particularly at wavelengths below 500 nm, questioning why reflectance peaks occur despite high imaginary refractive index values. Participants also discuss the relationship between wavelength and voltage, indicating the presence of additional band gaps. The conversation highlights the complexity of reflectance behavior in silicon and the need for further clarification on these phenomena.
hjelmgart
Messages
127
Reaction score
17
Hi all

When one measures the reflectance of say silicon, certain peaks appear in the graph. I am wondering, if anyone can explain the location of the peaks and their meaning.

Here the graph is, I hope the picture thing works, else here is the link.

Reflectivity%20of%20Silicon.png

The graph is for a polished silicon wafer.

So I have a few ideas, which could make sense in my head:

1: It is related to the band gap with respect to the transmission spectrum, however, the band gap of silicon is 1.1 eV, which is why I am confused.

I still think it could be related to the band gap, so now I am thinking, it is because the band gap may have other "paths", where it can conduct a current, but that it needs even more energy, to conduct through those gaps. But then I am confused, as the transmission is lowered at these areas..

2: It is related to the imaginary part of the refractive index, which is very high at the <500 nm wavelength. So why does the reflectance peak, when the imaginary refractive index is high?
I could understand it, as it relates to the extinction coefficient perhaps? A higher imaginary part would make a smaller penetration depth, and thus lower the transmission? But then why does it peak?

Anyway thanks for helping and merry x-mas!
 
Science news on Phys.org
E = h*u.
Therefore voltage = 1239.84 / (wavelength in nm)
Reading crude wavelengths from the graph and converting . . .
270 nm = 4.592 volt
360 nm = 3.444 volt
These are greater than 1.1 volt, but there are other band gaps available.
Since these differ by about 1.148 volt, I guess you have another band gap in series with the 1.1 volt gap and you are seeing the step between another level and the top or bottom of the commonly seen 1.1 volt band gap.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks that is what I was thinking as well, but I wasn't very sure. The numbers do help a lot to confirm it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
23K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K