What conditions are needed to get a stable limit cycle here?

Click For Summary
To observe a stable limit cycle in the given system, conditions on parameters A, B, C, and D must satisfy AC > 0. The analysis of the Jacobian matrix reveals that a Hopf bifurcation could occur if the trace is zero and the determinant is positive; however, the eigenvalues remain zero, indicating no typical bifurcation. When AC = 0, the fixed point merges with the trivial fixed point, leading to degenerate fixed points along the coordinate axes rather than a Hopf bifurcation. The system behaves more like a Volterra-Lotka model, suggesting concentric cycles rather than stable orbits. Further exploration of the system's dynamics and parameter effects is necessary for a comprehensive understanding.
JuanC97
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to find conditions over A,B,C,D to observe a stable limit cycle in the following system:
\frac{dx}{dt} = x \; (A-B y) \hspace{1cm} \frac{dy}{dt} = -y \; (C-D x)

Homework Equations


Setting dx/dt=0 and dy/dt=0 you can find that (C/D , A/B) is a fixpoint.

The Attempt at a Solution


When I evaluate the Jacobian matrix in that point...
<br /> J(x,y) = \left[<br /> \begin{matrix} <br /> A-B y &amp; -B x<br /> \\<br /> D y &amp; D x - C<br /> \end{matrix} \right]<br /> \: \Rightarrow \: J\left(\frac{C}{D}, \frac{A}{B}\right) = <br /> \left[ \begin{matrix} <br /> 0 &amp; -\frac{BC}{D}<br /> \\<br /> \frac{DA}{B} &amp; 0<br /> \end{matrix} \right]<br />
Since λ1 = λ2 = 0, a Hopf bifurcation could occur (If and only if Tr(J)=0 ∧ Det(J)>0). As a consequence... it's necesary to have A,B,C,D such that AC > 0, however, by definition A,B,C,D are positive.

Does it mean that I will always have a bifurcation? If so, why am I getting stable and unstable orbits when I change the parameters?. Also, if this approach is not useful to determine the requirements to have a stable limit cycle, then, what could be the best approach? (Sorry if these questions sound kinda basic - I'm trying to learn about this topic by myself)
 
This does not look like a system with a limit cycle, it looks like a Volterra-Lotka system, where you just have an infinite number of concentric cycles.
 
epenguin said:
it looks like a Volterra-Lotka system
You're right, however I'll have to search a lot more about this topic. If you know any book that would be helpful, I'd appreciate it.

By the way, I said I was "getting stable orbits" but... well, I wasn't studying the system for a sufficient long period of time so, yeah, it's just like you already said it... concentric cycles but nothing like a stable orbit. Thanks for the comment :thumbup:
 
At the moment I have forgotten stuff I knew even not that long ago, but I think with a small modification of this Volterra-Lotka system you can get limit cycles.

Others can suggest books, but you probably want fairly introductory or elementary. If your orientation is engineering, there is "nonlinear ordinary differential equations" by Jordan and Smith. Instead for biology, the most elementary if you can find it and written for biologists with little maths background is "modelling dynamic phenomena in molecular and cellular biology" by L A Segel. (1984). To read these books is to realize you could have worked most of it out yourself. Segel afterwards produced a number of books I have not seen, but which seem to be similar but taking it further with titles like "A primer on mathematical models in biology"
 
  • Like
Likes JuanC97
JuanC97 said:

Homework Statement


I want to find conditions over A,B,C,D to observe a stable limit cycle in the following system:
\frac{dx}{dt} = x \; (A-B y) \hspace{1cm} \frac{dy}{dt} = -y \; (C-D x)

Homework Equations


Setting dx/dt=0 and dy/dt=0 you can find that (C/D , A/B) is a fixpoint.

The Attempt at a Solution


When I evaluate the Jacobian matrix in that point...
<br /> J(x,y) = \left[<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> A-B y &amp; -B x<br /> \\<br /> D y &amp; D x - C<br /> \end{matrix} \right]<br /> \: \Rightarrow \: J\left(\frac{C}{D}, \frac{A}{B}\right) =<br /> \left[ \begin{matrix}<br /> 0 &amp; -\frac{BC}{D}<br /> \\<br /> \frac{DA}{B} &amp; 0<br /> \end{matrix} \right]<br />
Since λ1 = λ2 = 0, a Hopf bifurcation could occur (If and only if Tr(J)=0 ∧ Det(J)>0). As a consequence... it's necesary to have A,B,C,D such that AC > 0, however, by definition A,B,C,D are positive.

Does it mean that I will always have a bifurcation? If so, why am I getting stable and unstable orbits when I change the parameters?. Also, if this approach is not useful to determine the requirements to have a stable limit cycle, then, what could be the best approach? (Sorry if these questions sound kinda basic - I'm trying to learn about this topic by myself)

The only bifurcations occur where AC = 0.

What happens when AC = 0 is that the fixed point at (C/D, A/B) merges with the trivial fixed point at (0,0). This is not a Hopf bifurcation; it's something more complicated. When AC = 0 you end up with one or both of the coordinate axes consisting of degenerate fixed points.

A Hopf bifurcation occurs where a pair of complex conjugate eigenvalues crosses the imaginary axis, so that the real part changes sign. That's not what's happening here; it's just not possible to vary the parameters to make the real parts of the eigenvalues of the Jacobian at (C/D, A/B) anything other than zero. For all AC &gt; 0 this fixed point is a center; varying B or D just changes the location of the fixed point, not its type.
 
  • Like
Likes JuanC97
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K