I What conditions are needed to raise a linear operator to some power?

fxdung
Messages
387
Reaction score
23
Each operator has a domain, so for a power of an operator to exist, the domain of the operator must remain invariant under the operation.

Is that correct?

mentor note: edited for future clarity
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
fxdung said:
Each operator has a domain, so for a power of an operator to exist, the domain of the operator must remain invariant under the operation.

Is that correct?

mentor note: edited for future clarity
The range must be included in the domain, simply to allow a consecutive application.
 
fresh_42 said:
The range must be included in the domain, simply to allow a consecutive application.
This is the wrong approach if ##D(A)## is a proper subspace of a vector space ##X##.

For example, take ##X = C[0,1]## and ##D(A) = C^1[0,1]## and ##A : D(A) \to X## differentiation. Then the range of ##A## is not contained in its domain, but ##A^2## is well-defined with
$$
D(A^2) = C^2[0,1] = \{f \in D(A)\,:\,Af \in D(A)\}.
$$
(This also suggests the general definition.) This is important if one wants to talk about the generalized eigenspace of an unbounded operator, which is defined in terms of positive integer powers of ##\lambda I - A##, where ##I## is the identity on ##X## and ##\lambda## is an eigenvalue.
 
  • Informative
Likes Keith_McClary
Look up the Borel Functional Calculus. It formalizes the general idea of applying general Mathematical operations to linear operators.
 
  • Informative
Likes Keith_McClary
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top