What Conditions Must a Matrix Meet to Be a Density Matrix?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the conditions that a matrix must satisfy to qualify as a density matrix in quantum mechanics. Participants explore theoretical criteria, mathematical properties, and specific examples related to density matrices, particularly in the context of a single spin 1/2 particle.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a density matrix must satisfy conditions such as being Hermitian, having a trace equal to 1, and being nonnegative.
  • One participant mentions specific conditions from Ballentine, including the need for the determinant to be nonnegative.
  • A participant provides an example of a matrix representing a single spin 1/2 particle and discusses the implications of its parameters for it to be a density matrix.
  • Another participant corrects the earlier calculations regarding the purity condition and suggests that the factor of 1/2 was overlooked.
  • There is a discussion about the eigenvalues of the matrix and their implications for the conditions of being a density matrix.
  • One participant notes that the trace and determinant conditions are sufficient only for 2x2 matrices and highlights the need for checking eigenvalues in general cases.
  • A later reply asks about practical applications of density matrices in experimental physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic conditions for a matrix to be a density matrix, but there are differing interpretations and calculations regarding specific examples and the implications of those conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correctness of certain calculations and the broader applicability of the conditions discussed.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the dimensionality of the matrices discussed, as some conditions may not hold for matrices larger than 2x2. There are also unresolved mathematical steps in the calculations presented by participants.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and researchers interested in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying the properties of density matrices and their applications in quantum systems.

natugnaro
Messages
61
Reaction score
1
What are the conditions for some matrix to be a density matrix ?
I know of these conditions: 1.) [tex]\rho=\rho^{2}[/tex]
2.) [tex]Tr(\rho)=1[/tex] (for pure state)

Is this all ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

[tex]\rho\geq 0,\; tr(\rho )=1.[/tex]
 
ok, thanks.

As an example let's say I have a matrix 1/2((1 ,a),(a,1))
of single spin 1/2 particle at rest.
Then for this matrix to be a density matrix conditions (from Ballentine 2.10,2.11,2.12) give me that a=0,
and for this matrix to be a pure state matrix condition [tex]\rho^{2}[/tex]=[tex]\rho[/tex] gives me again that a=0.
Is this a right conclusion ?

sorry for latex problems.
 
First of all your matrix must be nonnegative. For 2x2 matrices hermitian that is equivalent to:

1) trace nonnegative (=sum of eigenvalues)
2) determinant nonnegative (=product of eigenvalues)

Assuming a is real, your matrix is hermitian.

Trace of your matrix is 1 - that's good.
Determinant is (1-a^2)/4. So, you know that a must by <= 1.

Now, you notice the determinant =0 means that one of the eigenvalues is 0. Since trace is 1, the other must be 1. That looks like in that case we have a projection operator on a 1-dimensional subspace - a pure state.

That suggests that you have made some mistake when calculating using the condition for purity. Probably you have forgotten the factor 1/2 in front of the matrix. You did not square it or something like that. Do it again carefully.
 
Eigenvalues of my matrix are l1=(1-a)/2 and l2=(1+a)/2,

1) trace nonnegative (=sum of eigenvalues)
this reduces to (1-a)/2 + (1+a)/2 which gives 1>=0, this condition is met.

2) determinant nonnegative (=product of eigenvalues)
(1-a)/2*(1+a)/2>=0 gives a is in the range -1 to 1 (-1 and 1 included).

so for my matrix to be a density matrix a can be in the range -1 to 1, this meets conditions
2.10-2.12 from Ballentine(Fredrik), and conditions 1) & 2) arkajad as I can see.

For pure state matrix (yes I have forgotten the factor 1/2 ) a can be either 1 or -1, since in both cases condition for pure state matrix are met.
Is this now correct on the first sight ?
 
Good. But remember, trace a determinant conditions are sufficient only for 2x2 matrices. In general, assuming that [tex]\rho[/tex] is hermitian, to check that [tex]\rho\geq 0[/tex] you must check either that [tex](\psi, \rho \psi)\geq 0[/tex] for all [tex]\psi[/tex] or that all eigenvalues of [tex]\rho[/tex] are nonnegative. Sometimes [tex]\rho[/tex] may be given as
[tex]\rho=\sum_i A_i^\dag A_i[/tex] - then it is automatically nonnegative. A necessary (but in general not sufficient) condition for a density matrix to describe a pure state is that its determinant is zero - because at least one of its eigenvalues must be zero.
 
Last edited:
one more thing, what are some applications of density matrices in practice ?
(I mean in experimental physics)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
856
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K