The discussion revolves around the concept of "culturally valued knowledge" as defined by Wikipedia, questioning its clarity and relevance. Participants argue that what is deemed "general knowledge" is highly culture-specific, varying significantly across different societies and contexts. They emphasize that knowledge considered general in one culture may not hold the same weight in another, highlighting the subjective nature of what constitutes valuable knowledge. The conversation also distinguishes between general knowledge and trivia, suggesting that general knowledge encompasses a broad understanding of various subjects, while trivia often consists of specific, less impactful facts. The participants express confusion over the classification of "general," noting that it can depend on factors like age and environment. Overall, the discussion critiques the term "culturally valued" and seeks to clarify what constitutes general knowledge in a meaningful way.