What Determines the Resolution Limit of a Microscope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eoghan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Microscope
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the resolution limit of microscopes, specifically how to derive the condition for resolving two point sources using the formula 1.22λ/NA. It explains that the angular separation of the images formed by two point sources leads to a path difference of 1.22λ, which is critical for determining resolution. The relationship between the distances and angles involved is explored through geometric considerations, particularly using the focal length of the lens. The derivation presented appears simpler than the textbook method, raising questions about its validity. Overall, understanding the connection between angular and linear resolution is emphasized as essential for accurate microscopy.
eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi there!
I wonder where the resolution limit for a microscope comes out. I know that the lens can act as a circular aperture of diameter D and so a point source is diffracted in a disk of angular aperture 1.22\lambda/D
Two sources are resolved if their distance is greater than (without Abbe correction) 1.22\lambda/NA
How can I obtain this result?
I'm reading Jenkins and White and they start supposing two point sources, O on the axis of the lens and O' slightly above which form images I and I'. Each image consists of a disk and the angular separation of the disks when they are on the limit of resolution is 1.22\lambda/D
When this condition holds, the wave from O' diffracted to I has zero intensity and the extreme rays O'BI and O'AI differ in path by 1.22lambda. (B is the top point of the lens, and A is the lower point; I is the position of the image of O and lies on the lens axis) Why do they differ in path by 1.22lambda?

I also attach the image, taken from the book, of the geometry
14iq0lw.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you have to derive first the size of the Airy disk in the focal plane. The rest is geometry.
 
I tried, but I'm not sure. The distance II' is
II'=f\sin(\theta)
where f is the distance of I from the center of the lens.
The images are resolved if
II'\geq f\frac{1.22\lambda}{D}
If we call f' the distance between O and the center of the lens, we have
\frac{OO'}{f'}=\frac{II'}{f}
therefore at the limit of the resolution
\frac{OO'}{f'}=\frac{f\frac{1.22\lambda}{D}}{f}
But from the geometry we know that
f'=\frac{\frac{D}{2}}{\tan(i)}\simeq\frac{D}{2sin(i)}
Thus, in the end
OO'=\frac{1.22\lambda}{2\sin(i)}

Is this all right? My doubt is that this derivation is much simpler than that given in textbook...
 
It may help to realize that angular resolution and linear resolution are related through the focal length of the lens 'f' and NA = D/2f (approximately).
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
679
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K